User talk:Childrenofparadise
Please unblock
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Childrenofparadise (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Journalist.Legit user Childrenofparadise (talk) 02:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
I am new to Wikipedia and dont understand what a sock puppet is. I am a Journalist who works for a small news company who just wants to help Wikipedia with factual information. Since I am supposed to be a sockpuppet, I have a request Sir, can you make a correction on the article https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Chhota_Shakeel The last line reads Shakeel died 6 January 2017 of a cardiac arrest in Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Please change it to Chhota Shakeel died on 6 January 2017 of a cardiac arrest in Dushanbe, Tajikistan Proper Grammar. My intention is not to cause any sort of damage or disruption. I understand what Wikipedia stands for and if given a chance will create an article at the soonest. A fine one.Childrenofparadise (talk) 07:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC) Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.
This account is blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Vaibhavpomal123. You'll need to address that. Huon (talk) 02:24, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Upon your request, I changed it to on, because yes, that would be a proper grammar. Now, please provide the proper reason why you got blocked. Admit that you were a sockpuppet, etc.--Biografer (talk) 18:11, 30 January 2019 (UTC)