User talk:Chiefsfocus

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rockchalk7 17 07:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Chiefsfocus

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Chiefsfocus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 13:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 14:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chiefsfocus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The purpose of this account is not to promote or advertise for free the Chiefs Focus blog. Perhaps I'm just a little uninformed or misdirected, but we were simply making an honest attempt to establish a wikipedia page for our brand. No intent to falsely represent any aspect of what we do or promote any part of what we do. If there is another avenue I need to travel down to pursue this, please let me know. I am very new to this process and completely uneducated on the ins and outs of establishing a wikipedia page, but I can assure you the intent is not to promote, simply to inform. Chiefsfocus (talk) 20:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't get to write about ourselves (or our brands) on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll give you some additional information. I don't have any sort of personal vendetta against you. I'm a huge Chiefs fan (I'll be watching the game tonight at home rocking my Patrick Mahomes jersey) and I even follow your Twitter page. Wikipedia does have conflict of interest policies (see WP:COI) and you would be obviously in violation of it establishing your own page. Additionally, another potential issue is Chiefs Focus may struggle to meet Wikipedia's notability requirements, WP:GNG and WP:WEBCRIT. Also, you can edit Wikipedia, you will have to change the username because you're not allowed to use brand names for usernames, per WP:ORGNAME. The block notice includes instructions for how you can change your username. Hope this helps. I wanna help out a fellow member of Chiefs Kingdom as much as possible! Within Wikipedia's policies of course.--Rockchalk7 17 17:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]