User talk:Chiefmic

Welcome!

Hello, Chiefmic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Italo Andre Omegna Vergara, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Davejohnsan (talk) 00:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Italo Andre Omegna Vergara

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Italo Andre Omegna Vergara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --Davejohnsan (talk) 00:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Italo Andre Omegna Vergara

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Italo Andre Omegna Vergara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --Davejohnsan (talk) 00:19, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Problems Facing the Upcoming Economic Twist

I like to call what is going to be written in this page , as Economics from the Tea Table. The concept is not new , however I haven't find anything that actually acknowledges the true fact of ignorant talking.

Economics from the Tea Table is generated from the dinner table philosophers.

So to start rules and definition of who to participate and how to recognized.

1- If you want to have an opinion please do, but be mindful that no one really know the truth of anything, and this is not about taking sides but just talk ideas without full knowledge. 2- What is written here it is not to be taken seriously nor a a joke. 3- It what is call mental diarrhoeal . 4- Dinner table philosopher are all of those who think who know bases on limited knowledge and mediocre imagination. 5- Welcome eternal complainer , however if you going to complain please don't. 6- Starts with economics it finishes with nothing. 7- No conspirational theorist, that is a bit tom much to try to handle. 8- All other subject welcome with pluralism. 9- Please share points of view and Ideas no sides or teams.

All the best to all ......

The current economic scenario has presented more questions than answer , but is it new ?? How can we be sure that this is not design to collapse and reborn ??

Anything new our history has become better after collapse , and although is a and idea that the current economics model is unfair and faulty , is much better that anything else . Ill continue to write but those are my thought of this 5 minutes of boredom.

April 2021

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that in this edit to James N. Farmer, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]