User talk:Chiefkc18

Chiefkc18, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Chiefkc18! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Show4me (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Still needs any further available in-depth third-party news sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Show4me and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:07, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, such as you did in the article SHOW4ME. Wikipedia is not the Yellow pages. If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 14:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines, as you did at SHOW4ME. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Laser brain (talk) 11:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion, as you did at SHOW4ME‎. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Laser brain (talk) 15:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chiefkc18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was preparing the article (SHOW4ME) for a long period - more than 1 year - I have passed all considirations and the article was approved - Then the guy (Laser_brain) just deleted everything - he left only innitial information in my article - when I tried to explain him that I did not tried to promote something - he just say me that I'm a lier and blocks me even when I added information about owning company and trademark - which cannot be considered as a promotional text. I beleive that Wikipedia is a normal place where normal people geather the information to one source. And hope that this guy blocked me because he just want to be a major of this place but not for any normal reason - So I hope that I will be unblocked and someone normal will check what he did and consider it again. Thanks.

Decline reason:

You were basically walking the line of acceptable behaviour with the creation of an article with so much promotional prose. When other editors fixed the article to have a more encyclopedic tone you repeatedly reverted it to place your promotional prose back. Wikipedia is not the place to draw attention to a website, and anything you write here is subject to being edited by other users. As it stands your entire contribution history seems dedicated to promoting your website. This is not an acceptable use of Wikipedia. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 15:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(ec) I see the unblock is already declined but noting anyway: When I began removing spam from SHOW4ME, this user began sending me emails demanding to know why they weren't allowed to build out the article and claiming they have no affiliation with the company. I repeatedly told them Wikipedia is not a platform for promoting their business and they continued to claim to be independent of the company. However, a simple google search of the name on the email yielded a LinkedIn profile of the CEO of "Show4Me". Cut-and-dry case of a company principal trying to use Wikipedia for financial gain. --Laser brain (talk) 15:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geez, if people are going to lie they should put some effort into it. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 15:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you beleive that CEO would edit wikipedia?? Lol - Are you a normal person after that? I have already explained you everything with normal tone - What was the promotion??? can you specify - the name of the company that owns this platform??? is this a promotion - or maybe main features that are informational only??? Or there was any text like - Join the website and enjoy!!! The only thing that deffers you from a normal person is that you just try to edit the article because you did not like me, but not for any normal reason - So that means tha you're the person with a lot of complexes and the only thing you can do is just show me that you're an administrator and you have more rights! I normally asked you to help me to make this article normal - did you answer me something??? no - because you want to be paid for that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiefkc18 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 13 June 2016‎

Yes, we get CEOs editing Wikipedia all the time. Not the CEOs of companies like Microsoft or Apple, but of tiny little websites that are seeking to promote themselves. Care to address the e-mail that you sent being from the same e-mail listed for the CEO? Keep in mind that your behaviour here reflects on your company, this page is publicly readable. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 16:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear HighInBC, Unfortunatelly, I'm not a CEO of this tiny little website - I know the CEO personally, that's why he gived me his email to make edits and provided me with more information regarding a company. BTW, this message was addressed to Laser_Brain. not to you. But in any case - I ask you both to unblock me - I will not add any kind of information to the artilce without considiration from your side. Could you be so kind? Thanks. My appologies for crossing the line of behaivour here. I was just really angry because I prepared this article for one year and this is my first article to Wikipedia. And I was really happy when it was confirmed. Then Mr. Laser Brain came and deleted everything.

Dear HighInBC. Hope you're happy for deleting the article and your ambitions incresed. Thanks for explaining me that wikipedia is not a free inciclopedia - it is some kind of site where such "amazing" people like you make money. You're definetly the best Head of gate. Lol - Enjoy yourself when you're looking into the mirror. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiefkc18 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 13 June 2016‎

Wait, am I supposed to be getting paid? I have been editing for 10 years and have not gotten a single pay cheque! HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 18:33, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chiefkc18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I ask you to unblock me please. I will not edit SHOW4ME article without considiration with other Editors (administrators) - but not with Laser_brain - All he says here is a crap and why I have to be a victum of this guy.

Decline reason:

Your behaviour on this page alone is more than sufficient to justify the block. Yamla (talk) 17:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppets

Creating additional accounts (ChestnayaInfa) to attempt to reinsert promotional material into Wikipedia is not going to help you. Please see Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. --Laser brain (talk) 20:10, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chiefkc18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not do any corrections without advise - I had a sockpuppet account, I created it today, I am sorry that I did it, I won't do it again. Chiefkc18 (talk) 21:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

After all the problems outlined above, you compound it by socking and then expect to be unblocked? I really see no benefit to the encyclopedia having you here continuing to try to promote your web site. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.