User talk:PPEMES/Archives/2015/October
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:PPEMES. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Why have you changed the category from Secret societies to Secret student societies? This is strange as the Pythagoreans were grown-ups and existed as a secret society for many years. Do you mean they were "students" of the long-dead Pythagoras? I think the former category was distinctly preferable. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:49, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- In logic of arguably academically inclined, but if that's your take, you might as well recategorise it? Chicbyaccident (talk) 10:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Will do, many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:54, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Please consider stating a comment on the category's discussion page to you reversion as a note to any eventual further concerns? Chicbyaccident (talk) 10:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, good idea. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Please consider stating a comment on the category's discussion page to you reversion as a note to any eventual further concerns? Chicbyaccident (talk) 10:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Will do, many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:54, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Freemasons and Cat:Secret societies
I have replied to your comment at Category:Freemasonry. Blueboar (talk) 14:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Category:Orientalist fraternalism
Category:Orientalist fraternalism, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. MSJapan (talk) 23:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Your edits...
Your recent edits to Freemasonry involved making section moves to a GA-level article without discussion. Discuss them on talk. Your change to the Freemasonry template was also not appropriate; links are where they are because of discussion. I appreciate the fact that you would like to work on articles in the Freemasonry topic area, but you are not editing in a manner which is improving the material. MSJapan (talk) 19:01, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for the notice. Chicbyaccident (talk) 19:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 14 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Grand United Order of Oddfellows page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)