User talk:CheyNow21
| This user is a student editor in Wells_College/Wetland_Ecology_(Fall_2019) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, CheyNow21, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Week 3 Feedback
[edit]Hi Cheyenne, Good work this week. Good job finding sources. I gave you more specific source feedback on the Talk page of your article where you introduced yourself KHillWells (talk) 14:32, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Week 7 Feedback
[edit]Hi Chey, Your article is in a very basic state but it can be greatly expanded because we have a LOT of information on this topic. I think the best way to proceed right now is to figure out some basic sections to break the article into because right now it is a single paragraph that just has a lot of information in it. Some useful sections that I might advise would be: Hydrology, Vegetation, Animals, Distribution, Functions and Services, Classification, Restoration (Not necessarily in that order)
The EPA classification in this article is good: https://www.epa.gov/wetlands/classification-and-types-wetlands#marshes
- wet meadows
- prairie potholes
- vernal pools
- playa lakes
You have chosen a very broad article topic, which is going to make it harder and easier to edit. Harder, because there is just too much information. Basically, ALL of our semester lectures can apply here. Easier, because there is a LOT of information to go from so you should not have trouble finding any.
Here are my overall comments:
- You don't have to write the entire article and write EVERYTHING about freshwater marshes. Just write what you can, and focus on providing a little in each section that others might expand on later
- Keep in mind that freshwater marshes are Palustrine emergent wetlands. This might help you in talking about them. You should also include this Cowardin classification in the lead section of the article to clarify things for readers
- The sources for the current article are POOR. There is so much good information out there. I have textbooks in my office just waiting for you. Some of the links to the references are broken. Focus on removing those and getting some new good sources.
- Freshwater marshes are not only found in Florida or in mouths of rivers, the lead section is misleading. Basically, the lead section will need a lot of re-working.
I gave you a lot to work with. Just remember to publish your changes frequently and every time you do, write a summary of what you did, so that someone can follow along. When you answer any of my comments here, make sure to use the colon to start your answer. This will indent your text so it can be easily differentiated from mine. Good luck KHillWells (talk) 14:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- Okay I will definitely look into making those sections. I know that I can use most of our notes from class but I didn't know if I should since there is no way to cite them, is there? I will definitely come get some books tomorrow after class. Thanks! CheyNow21 (talk) 19:35, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Like we talked about, citing my lecture notes is not a good idea because they are not publicly available. ALL of the information in my lectures came from the textbooks you borrowed so hopefully having those will help you. KHillWells (talk) 18:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Week 8 Peer Review- Mike Compagni
[edit]Hello Cheyanne,
Comparing the article that's live and comparing your sandbox article, it's much more organized. I like the different sections because it's easier to read and follow along. The lead section is very easy to understand and basic, which makes it easier for other people to read as well. I think all sections have a very good start, the content is good and easy to read and understand. I definitely think all sections can be expanded out more and it's hard because I'm in the same boat as to what to add and what not to add in my own article. I feel most of the content that can be incorporated in this article we've learned in class, so with the use of your lecture notes and your sources you've picked out, you can start to get deeper and more specific. The sources you've picked out are the best ones compared to the original article's. The original article's sources aren't the best in my opinion. So my suggestions are to keep chugging along and dive a bit deeper in each of your sections, use our lecture notes and your sources to further the article. I believe it will be a good article when all said and done. Good Luck! Mike CompagniMike Compagni (talk) 13:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Mike! Thank you for the feedback! That is what I have been struggling with! So much of the information from class could fit in, the question is just what to add and how to cite it! And if I should keep the random section about the Everglades. Thanks again! CheyNow21 (talk) 19:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- Just wanted to pop in here to say that I think the Everglades section should stay because it is an enormous ecosystem (According to the cited source it's the largest freshwater marsh in the world (the source seems to be legitimate)). So I would leave it but maybe edit it to fit the article. Right now that section is a little random, but maybe you can create a new section called "Notable Marshes" and throw that in there. KHillWells (talk) 18:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC)