User talk:Chevr92

Welcome!

Hello, Chevr92, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fabricationary 04:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discography of Eminem

(Pretaining to the many edits you made in a row)

If you want to correct a short page, please use the Show preview button (next to Save Page) to see what other mistakes are there. (Please respond on my talk page if you must.) tinlv7 06:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Say It Right

In Canada there is an airplay chart, which is the chart on which "Say It Right" reached number one, and a singles chart, which "Say It Right" hasn't entered (I don't think it has been released on CD in Canada,). There needs to be a distinction between the two, which is why I restored the "BDS" (as in Nielsen BDS) mention you removed. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 14:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard charts in song articles

Please do not insert into song articles Billboard magazine component charts (such as the Hot Digital Songs), and other equally non-notable charts (e.g. the Hot RingMasters), unless there is a very good reason to do so (e.g. a song appeared on one of those charts but not on one of the more important ones). There has been extensive discussion about this, and a consensus arose that charts such as the Hot 100, Pop 100 and a few others are adequate indicators of the popularity of a song to readers of a general-purpose encyclopedia. For more information, please read Wikipedia:Record charts; if you want to comment on the guidelines there, feel free to leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Record charts. Thanks! Extraordinary Machine 22:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doe Boy Fresh

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed maintenance notices from Doe Boy Fresh, even though required changes haven't been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. --Geniac 16:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet notice

I believe you might have been caught in the crossfire here. Possibly an idea if we can discuss this somewhere like User talk:Agathoclea where the rest of the Don Gotti problem currently gets discussed. I am rather busy in real life due to work commitments and the death of a friend. So I might be very slow answering. Please leave the notice intact until everyone is convinced it is wrong. Agathoclea 20:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Preview

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. --Geniac 18:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hot 100 number-one hits of 2007 (USA)

Please do not remove sources (and entire "references" sections, for that matter) from articles. I'm sure you are aware that articles require reliable sources, so having external links like this are important for the validity of articles. Thanks. - eo 23:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, do not REMOVE verifiable sources from articles.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Hot 100 number-one hits of 2007 (USA), are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. - eo 22:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you can explain a valid reason for repeatedly removing external source links from this article, your edits are considered vandalism.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Hot 100 number-one hits of 2007 (USA), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo 22:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Flavor of Love Girls: Charm School. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Real 96 18:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Component charts

Please see WP:CHARTS regarding the formatting of charts tables in song articles. Component charts should not be added. These include airplay charts and ringtones charts. Thanks. - eo 15:27, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that, instead of responding to messages left on your talk page and discussing the matter with other editors, you are simply reverting their edits to articles. I have also reason to believe that you have been doing this via the IP 65.11.95.34 (talk · contribs). You may believe that every Billboard chart should be included, but this contradicts the WP:CHARTS guideline. If you disagree with this guideline, please explain why at Wikipedia talk:Record charts, but do not simply ignore it — or any policy or guideline page — without any explanation or discussion. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 14:27, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007, more with component charts

Again, please stop adding component charts to song article tables. See WP:CHARTS for more information. Other editors should not have to clean up after you. Continued disruptive edits like this are considered vandalism. Thanks. - eo 20:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Larrisa

A tag has been placed on Larissa "Bootz" Hodge, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Page was already deleted more then once...no sources

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dont make the page again.

Wikilink formatting

In accordance with Wikipedia:Piped link, please don't conceal or "pipe" links in a way that would be misleading to the reader, e.g. [[UK Singles Chart|UK]]. Most readers would click the link expecting to be taken to the article on the United Kingdom, so they would find it surprising and not useful to be taken to the UK Singles Chart article. So it should either be, using the UK chart example, [[UK Singles Chart]] or [[UK]]. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 15:48, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As above, stop adding component charts to music articles per WP:CHARTS

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. - eo 16:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. - eo 16:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usher

The album does not have a name yet, do not change it again.--FSX-2007 (talk) 23:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

The song's correct title is "Love in This Club" per its listing in Billboard magazine. Please don't move it again. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 22:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Tropical Storm Marco (2008), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Also it's clear that you're the IP or helping the IP to push a POV. Bidgee (talk) 23:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Tropical Storm Marco (2008). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 23:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to 2008 Atlantic hurricane season, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bidgee (talk) 23:05, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Tropical Storm Marco (2008), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bidgee (talk) 23:06, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Storm Marco (2008)

I've protected the article from editing as a result of an edit war. You have violated WP:3RR, but for now, I'll just warn you not to continue. If you continue to edit war, further action may be necessary. Cheers, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 23:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for engaging in an edit war. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Blueboy 96 23:26, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No matter what your credentials are, we don't look kindly on blind reversions without discussion on the talk page. That's what the talk page is for--I suggest you make use of it when you come back. Blueboy 96 23:27, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Battlefield

Hello, please do not make reversions and changes which are unrequired such as giving singles their own section. If you look at albums such as Beyonce's Dangerously in Love or Ciara's Fantasy Ride, both have been featured and noted for the high quality, neither have individual single sections. Official singles are part of an album's commericial success - they are one measure of it. please do not give any album its own singles section. and in future discuss your edits by using the discussion tab at the top of each page and also WP:edit summary (Lil-unique1 (talk) 13:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Chevr92. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]