User talk:CheesyChips342
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Shingling334 (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
 | This user is new to Wikipedia. Please assume good faith, remain civil, and be calm, patient, helpful, and polite while they become accustomed to Wikipedia and its intricacies. |
June 2018
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Performing arts has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Performing arts was changed by CheesyChips342 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951499 on 2018-06-11T08:59:34+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:59, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Driftland. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PamD 10:36, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Performing arts, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 12:26, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi CheesyChips. I just thought I'd gently point out that some of your edits have been a bit over-zealous and a couple have been incorrect. I think moving entire pages and/or re-titling them (as you did here is a pretty forthright move. This is not to say it's wrong but one would normally go to a talk page to make such a fundamental change. Talk pages are great: you can begin discussion and make your case, in order to seek consensus from other editors. Of course I assume good faith so this is not a telling off. I can see that in a fairly short time you've been reverted and/or engaged on here several times so I would suggest making more minor and/or clearly sourced changes. Peace. NEDOCHAN (talk) 11:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello again- I notice that you have immediately reverted back to your change- this is not a positive sign. There has already been discussion on the article's talk page (under 'naming'). This is where you can make your case. Until then, it should stay as it is. This is the way Wikipedia works.NEDOCHAN (talk) 11:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018
[edit]
Hello, I'm DVdm. An edit you recently made to Galileo Galilei seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 11:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 11:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)