User talk:Chauna07
This user is a student editor in American_University/Women,_Politics_and_Political_Leadership_(Spring_2018) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Chauna07, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 02:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Richard Maddicks
[edit]I deleted the page Richard Maddicks, as there was almost no content and a google search did not come up with an artist by that name. If you think you can find enough independent, reliable sources to make an encyclopedic article, please try it again at Draft:Richard Maddicks. That will give you some time to get the article into shape and get it reviewed before moving it into main space. Cheers!--Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Diane Benscoter
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Diane Benscoter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Non-Dropframe talk 19:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Diane Benscoter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
There do not seem to be secondary sources to establish her notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CalSteven (talk) 17:46, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Notes
[edit]Hi! I just wanted to give you some quick feedback - the draft looks good so far, my main notes would be to be careful with tone and to make sure that everything is properly sourced. My only concern is that this sometimes reads more casually than Wikipedia typically prefers, but overall this is good. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:02, 30 March 2018 (UTC)