User talk:Chase2na

August 2015

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Arthur (season 18), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Due to extensive vandalism, ALL numerical changes to kids' media and train-related articles must cite reliable sources. SummerPhD^v2.0 14:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Steven Universe episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 00:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Amazing World of Gumball (season 4). You MUST source future episodes and any viewership numbers. Also, you cannot copy-paste episode descriptions from Cartoon Network. See WP:COPYVIO. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:40, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of Clarence episodes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Continual addition of unreferenced info in episode lists... EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:54, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Due to extensive vandalism, ALL numerical changes to articles involving kids' media or trains MUST cite reliable sources. - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SummerPhDv2.0: It's continuing... [1] EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 00:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 5 albert square (talk) 01:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Further to my block message above, I will advise you that this is likely to be your last chance. You have been warned numerous times by both @EvergreenFir: and @SummerPhDv2.0: about what you should be doing and you do not appear to be paying attention to this advice. It is important to cite reliable sources so that information can be verified. If you continue to ignore the warnings and advice given to you, it may be that your next block is indefinite.--5 albert square (talk) 01:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Disney Channel All Star House Party

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Disney Channel All Star House Party, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://disney.wikia.com/wiki/Disney_Channel_All_Star_House_Party. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Keystone Motel

The article Keystone Motel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not TV guide-episode of show with no info

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 23:56, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keystone Motel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keystone Motel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keystone Motel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 01:46, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

bibliomaniac 1 5 07:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chase2na, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SummerPhD^v2.0 03:40, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]