User talk:Charmkey

Anna Esaki-Smith moved to draftspace

Please see log comment. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 01:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Charmkey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello! I am asking to be unblocked because I am not Sockpuppet of anyone. I know Francevbj - he is my husband, but all other accounts are unfamiliar to me. You are right, I confess that Francevbj and I often visit Wikipedia from same IP, because we live in the same house. And we use a proxy servers because of the censorship in our country. But neither I nor he broke any of the Wikipedia rules and did not use our accounts for illegitimate reasons, etc. I have never done it and never will. I did not write anything about article due to which Francevbj has problems and never will; I have carefully read Wiki-rules and undertake to abide by them.

Plus I want to continue to contribute to Wikipedia - at the moment I have joined the "Women in Red" and am going to create and edit several articles about famous women of our time. Have a nice day! Charmkey (talk) 12:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Given the substantial overlap in editing, I'm afraid this counts as WP:MEAT. Until Francevbj is unblocked, this account must remain blocked. Yamla (talk) 12:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 21

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Charmkey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I confirm that Francevbj and I simultaneously edited the same article (this was due to the "quest" from https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&gettingStartedReturn=true), but I must kindly remind that this is not violation of Wikipedia rules (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry) - editing the text of the same article is allowed and we did not participate in discussions, did not simultaneously influence any decisions, and so on. We are two different people and have already repeatedly offered to confirm this with our documents. Therefore, I ask you to unblock me - I have not committed any violations.

Charmkey (talk) 13:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted, the other account will need to be dealt with first. 331dot (talk) 13:26, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Anna Esaki-Smith moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anna Esaki-Smith, is not suitable as written to remain published. Nine of the sources used dud yes the subject in depth, which is what we require for a biography. Just being quoted isn’t enough. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 18:08, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anna Esaki-Smith

Hello, Charmkey. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anna Esaki-Smith, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anna Esaki-Smith

Hello, Charmkey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anna Esaki-Smith".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]