User talk:CharlieBrown25

This user may have left Wikipedia. CharlieBrown25 has not edited Wikipedia since 14 October 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

CharlieBrown25, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi CharlieBrown25!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:36, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Your recent editing history at Dinosaur Train shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. SummerPhD (talk) 12:07, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are currently editing against the current consensus on the article's talk page. You have been repeatedly asked for independent reliable sources for the material you wish to add, as required by verifiability one of our core policies. Please stop adding the material until you have established a consensus on the article's talk page.

If you continue to add the material -- in any form -- without first establishing a consensus for its inclusion, you will be blocked from editing. (Technically, you could have been -- perhaps should have been blocked for your repeated edits today, as you were already under an edit warring warning when you made the edits.) This is your final warning. - SummerPhD (talk) 04:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:CharlieBrown25 reported by User:SummerPhD (Result: ). Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 05:34, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Dinosaur Train". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 04:44, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaur Train

It's funny you came on my talk page just as I was unwatching Dinosaur Train and your page. I know what it's like having a hot button issue and being stonewalled - been there done that. But to be honest your issue with Dinosaur Train has gotten tiresome beyond belief. You don't listen and nothing angers editors more. So I'll say it again. Drop it, let it go, let the storyline evolve and see where it goes in a few months. Slight Smile 23:18, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

Thank you for establishing consensus at Dinosaur Train. Here's a wiki-pie. I noticed you haven't been formally welcomed to Wikipedia, so... welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I know we didn't really get off to a great start, and I hope we can work together in the future.

I do hope you like the place and decide to stay. You may find the following links helpful, as we usually present them to new editors:

If you ever need help, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Good luck, and happy editing! Mz7 (talk) 18:18, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dinosaur Train may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* '''Buddy''' (voiced by [[Phillip Corlett]], then [[Sean Thomas]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:14, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Dinosaur Train with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 01:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Remove notice because explanation of removal of content has been given to me. I see some consensus has been developed with respect to the content of the article. Please proceed as that has developed. Donner60 (talk) 07:15, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Olive the Ostrich

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Olive the Ostrich, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 06:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have a mix of both constructive and unconstructive edits - please realize that we're here to build an encyclopedia, and joke edits are not appropriate in the midst of constructive work. Continuous vandalism can and will lead to a block. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 06:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mango Plumo

added a link pointing to Beanie

Sprout (TV network)

added a link pointing to Justin Time

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mango Plumo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mango Plumo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mango Plumo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AdrianGamer (talk) 11:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Hi. I stumbled across your user page, and while I appreciate your kindness, I don't feel it's appropriate for a user page. User pages may optionally contain limited information about yourself as a person and/or as an editor, but in my opinion, it shouldn't be like a page where you list all of your favorite and least favorite editors. In the end, it's your choice. I don't think there's anything very "disruptive" about it, but I personally think it should represent you yourself as a person, not what you think about others. If you would like to express your gratitude toward another user, a simple personal message on their user page does the job very nicely. —Mz7 (talk) 03:17, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mz7: Well, I finally got around to changing my user page, and wanted to know what you think of it. (you'll notice I've discovered the wonderful world of userboxes as well!) - CharlieBrown25 (talk) 05:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your message

You are forgiven. Unfortunately, I won't be here long. After no one believed what I said that Cowboy Bebop: The Movie was not a TriStar film and I wasn't using IMDb a source, I'm quitting Wikipedia. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 14:30, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FilmandTVFan28: Gosh, are you sure you want to quit? How much have you tried to convince them? Couldn't you just give them a link to your sources?

Santo Bugito

Hi there, your edit at Santo Bugito isn't particularly helpful. There's clearly been a dispute about content, and merely restoring the content without 1) providing a source and 2) participating in discussion on the article's talk page doesn't do anything to remedy the dispute. Consensus is not determined through edit-warring, it's determined through discussion. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi CharlieBrown25! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 06:50, Tuesday, February 16, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi CharlieBrown25! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 06:52, Tuesday, February 16, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Proposed deletion of Mango plumo

The article Mango plumo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per the results of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mango Plumo. No new sources had been provided.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AdrianGamer (talk) 14:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mango Plumo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mango Plumo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mango Plumo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 14:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation Science

Thank you for reverting yourself on the deletion of info in the lead. If you discuss it on the talk page, it will generate a lively discussion. I think a lot of the feedback will be negative, certainly mine will because the creationist people included the word science in their name, but it is certainly a worthy topic. 18:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC) Lipsquid (talk) 18:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Never Gonna Give You Up, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dave Dial (talk) 02:51, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FilmandTVFan28

Hi Mr. Brown you may not remember me but I was that ip user that got into trouble with the user FilmandTVFan28 (almost 2 years ago) over Anivision working on Santo Bugito. I just wanted to let you know that not long after he blocked me for and has been blocking every single account that I have made since (I had to go to a whole new location, just to write this message). Trust me I have learned my mistakes from the past, but this bully is downright blocking all of my accounts WITHOUT warning for stuff like adding useful info/facts onto pages, fixing grammatical errors, adding 1 character on articles (like a letter, punctuation mark, etc), and so much more. He has also blocked at least 3 more ip's in the process. I was wondering if you could help me take this bully down? He just has to stop blocking me for doing nothing wrong. (It has gotten to the point where I am crying because I am being treated like garbage for doing very little wrong). Now I hope you get this message before that bully comes in and deletes it (as I think he is watching my ip address). Best of luck Nic Nagel.Ms. Trya (talk) 16:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, I totally remember that whole Santo Bugito thing. But I don't remember how you were involved in it. Sure thing, I'll help you out. Sorry it's been awhile. What would you like me to do Ms. Trya? FilmandTVFan28 is pretty mean. He doesn't seem to care about the common good, and only wants his way. I remember he was very rotten to me. Talk to a great user named Mz7 about it. He's very kind, patient and helpful. He helped me out back when I was new. I'll try to help the best I can. I don't think FilmandTVFan28 will budge just by talking to him. He's a stubborn guy. I sure hope that we can stop him. I was just like you once, and I learned from my mistakes. Mz7 knows way more about things around here than I do. - CharlieBrown25 (talk) 00:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ms. Trya: First of all, FilmandTVFan28 is not an administrator, so he could not have been the one to block you (only administrators can block accounts). Secondly, it sounds like you are not being blocked because you are making grammatical fixes; rather, you are being blocked because you are evading past blocks. To put it simply: blocked users are not allowed to edit under any account. In order to continue editing, you will need to convince administrators that there are good reasons for unblocking you. Creating new accounts to evade blocks is considered a form of "sock puppetry" or abuse of multiple accounts, and it is a serious breach of community trust here, and typically your accounts will automatically be blocked upon being discovered.

The purpose of blocks is not to bully you or to punish you, but to protect Wikipedia from the disruption caused by abusing multiple accounts. When you use multiple accounts, you split your editing history, preventing the community from being able to review your contributions, and it also makes it look like there are multiple people editing an article when it's really just one person; you can see how that's pretty deceptive. The solution is to log back in to your original account – the first account you ever used to edit Wikipedia – and follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. It sounds like the problem isn't FilmandTVFan28, but your evasion of your blocks. I hope this information is helpful. Mz7 (talk) 02:45, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if I sound really grumpy here. After about a year of being an administrator myself, I feel that I've kind of become jaded to users who evade blocks. If you can provide more information, such as the name of your past accounts or IP addresses, I might be able to better explain to you why you were originally blocked so that you can better understand what you need to do to get those blocks lifted. Mz7 (talk) 02:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mz7: Wow! That's awesome Mz7, you became an administrator! You've always been so helpful to me, and thanks for helping straighten this out. Remember helping me with the Dinosaur Train thing all those years ago? That was great! You really explained a lot to me. Thanks for all the great work you do here! One day you should win Wikipedian of the year. (That is a thing right? I think I saw it once). - CharlieBrown25 (talk) 07:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I don’t think I deserve such an award, but I do want to let you know that if you read my request for adminship, I mentioned you and your dispute on Dinosaur Train in my response to question 3.

Mz7 (talk) 21:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mz7: Hey, that's amazing! My whole thing was actually able to help you become and admin! I think I might have mentioned once that you should be one. Really, I picture you like as that stereotype of the wise man who sits on the mountain for Wikipedia. I find it funny that here we are again, you, me, and FilmandTVfan28. It seems that you've resolved the problem here with Ms. Trya. Again, great job! - CharlieBrown25 (talk) 08:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mr. Brown so sorry for the late reply, but I just wanted to thank you for helping me, you are truly an awesome person for that :-). Also I wanted to see if you wanted anything else from me?18:07, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Mrs. Tyra (talk)