User talk:Changez121

Welcome!

Hello, Changez121, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ek Doosre Se Karte Hain Pyaar Hum, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GB fan 02:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ek Doosre Se Karte Hain Pyaar Hum

The article Ek Doosre Se Karte Hain Pyaar Hum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An upcoming tv show with no discussion in reliable sources that I have been able to find.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GB fan 02:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Changez121, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! heather walls (talk) 06:53, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aadalat, you may be blocked from editing. Yash t 101 14:10, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aadalat, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yash t 101 14:11, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You re-added 39 000 bytes of running plotline to Saas Bina Sasural‎. WP:SOAPS says to have a brief overview of the programme as whole. Re-adding will be taken as disruptive editing. Span (talk) 17:59, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Changez121. You have new messages at Yasht101's talk page.
Message added 14:25, 14 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yash t 101 14:25, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Copyright violations

Your addition to Ek Hazaaron Mein Meri Behna Hai has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 22:39, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The same for your additions to Love U Zindagi and Hats Off Productions. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 22:46, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. B music ian 14:41, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Changez121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My Contributions are nice But My IP (182.183.128.0/17) is blocked due to that i've been Blocked Please Unblock me.(if you don't want to unblock then plzzz don't remove the talk page access)... If i do some thing wrong then block me at that time now just once give me Chance Plzzzzz this is a request Unblock this user or this IP (Unblock:182.183.128.0/17) Plzzzzz grant my Request i'll never do anything Wrong I Promise & I want to upload few images at wiki thanx Changez121 (talk · contribs) 07:27, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not allowed to edit from an IP while blocked, as it is you the person who is currently not allowed to edit, not just your account. If you want to be unblocked, you will need to address the problems that got you blocked, which includes demonstrating that you understand what those problems were. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:50, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Changez121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But I've not requested to be unblocked for editing by an IP.. Rather i've requested to make an account and make a contributions by that account Plzzzz Unblock Just give me last Chance.. Forgive me....Plzzzzzzz I Love editing Wikipedia and i can't wait till June 5,2012.. Give me last chance I really really really really really really promise that i'll make good contributions by my account which I'll create Just Last Chance Plzzzzz Changez121 (talk · contribs) 10:02, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"One more chance"???? How many accounts have you created already? YOU, the person are blocked from editing this project; period. You may not create account, period. You may not edit this project, period. You have had more than enough chances already. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:17, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Look, this is a PRIVATELY-OWNED WEBSITE. You broke the terms of membership again and again and again. You are not welcome to edit here; period. Your ONLY option is to GO AWAY. Edit another Wikimedia project. Show you're trustable. After 6 full months, go back to your ORIGINAL account and request unblock. If you edit anonymously OR by another account or even create another account, this WP:OFFER will be fully revoked; period. At that point a permanent WP:BAN discussion will be undertaken. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:46, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Adaalat episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Adaalat episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Adaalat episodes (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:29, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]