User talk:Chananme

Speedy deletion nomination of GRM BRAINFUCK

Hello, Chananme,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, GRM BRAINFUCK, for deletion, because it's impossible to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 12:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Cover of GRM BRAINFUCK by Sibylle Berg.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cover of GRM BRAINFUCK by Sibylle Berg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 12:45, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GRM BRAINFUCK moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, GRM BRAINFUCK, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This should prevent other attempts to delete the page before you've started writing it. Are you sure that the book is notable? – do you have six to eight solid independent reliable sources which discuss it in depth and in detail? If so, adding them to the page would be a good first step.

It seems likely that you have some personal or professional connection to Sibylle Berg, and thus a conflict of interest; if so, you should disclose it. If you receive or expect to receive payment or recompense of any kind from her or her agents, disclosure is obligatory and takes priority over any other edit you might be thinking of making. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:51, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GRM BRAINFUCK.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GRM BRAINFUCK.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:GRM: Brainfuck concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:GRM: Brainfuck, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:GRM: Brainfuck

Hello, Chananme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "GRM: Brainfuck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 14:49, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Format broken

The format of nearly all References is broken in the article Sibylle Berg. Is this vandalism? Grimes2 (talk) 05:04, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Sibylle Berg

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sibylle Berg, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]