Jump to content

User talk:Chanakyathewarrior

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2017

[edit]

Hello, I'm Home Lander. I noticed that in this edit to Vegetarianism, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:RS: Blogspot pages, self-published PDFs etc. are not acceptable sources. utcursch | talk 17:05, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please don't add Shrimad Rajchandra to the See also sections of various pages unless there is any direct relevance. See WP:SEEALSO guidelines. utcursch | talk 17:09, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.
You are giving deceptive edit summaries with disruption such as with your edit in Ahimsa. Please do not do so. Your cooperation is requested,
Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Atmnn. Thank you. utcursch | talk 17:34, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. utcursch | talk 18:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: No edit warring

[edit]

Chanakyathewarrior: You have already received the 3RR warning notice for another article. Please quit your edit warring in other articles such as Jainism (1, 2), Ahimsa, etc as well. If you do not stop your disruption, an admin review of your editing privileges is likely. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 18:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]