User talk:Chamaquito

Welcome!

Hello, Chamaquito, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -Will Beback 20:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove text without justification

I saw you do this, Chamaquito [1].

You cannot do that without providing a reason. I had a sourced, reasonable sentence. You cannot remove stuff without a rationale. WhisperToMe 23:42, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Culver_City_Boyz&curid=7534443&diff=151440049&oldid=150628184

Clown's right - You have to provide a source. See Wikipedia:No original research - Even if the section is true, if there are no sources, it cannot be placed WhisperToMe 20:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Night Krawlers

Night Krawlers, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Night Krawlers satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night Krawlers and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Night Krawlers during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. • Lawrence Cohen 05:24, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Chris Hoang

A tag has been placed on Chris Hoang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Stijndon (talk) 20:04, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanh Phung

I have corrected the coding for your redirect of this page to Chris Hoang. For future reference, please note that the correct way to create a redirect from one page to another is to put this as the only text on the page:

#REDIRECT [[Chris_Hoang]]

More information on redirects can be found at Wikipedia:Redirect. Bookgrrl ^holler/lookee here 20:05, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Yesenia palacios

A tag has been placed on Yesenia palacios requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 20:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daisy Velasquez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daisy Velasquez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daisy Velasquez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GRuban (talk) 02:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]