User talk:Chalgran

Welcome!

Hello, Chalgran, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Chemenish, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:35, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chemenish

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Chemenish, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:35, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chemenish

An article that you have been involved in editing, Chemenish, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemenish. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. snigbrook (talk) 17:01, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your supposed YouTube links are complete BS. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chemenish

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Chemenish, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 21:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From Talk:Chemenish

This article should not be deleted as it is not made up, simple, it is a commonly used vocal pattern and is merely an explanation and detailed article on this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chalgran (talk • contribs)

Yeah, right. Prove it. Reliable sources, please. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about sources period? I couldn't find any on Google. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 21:20, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe that's because it's, oh, made up? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:41, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]