User talk:ChainChomp2

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, ChainChomp2. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:19, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ChainChomp2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Norwegian Air Shuttle / Norwegian Long Haul tail art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Travel Service (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited OpenSkies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.
Please note that it is mandatory to state sources and if possible citations for any changes as you failed to do so multiple times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.174.20.174 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

>Goes into user's recent contribs
>Fishes for contribs to rapidly revert while paying no mind to what the page actually looks like
>Big textboxes (full of sources) too confusing therefore they must be wrong
>Removes sources in the process of reverting
>Has the nerve to remind them to state sources
>[Or maybe it's that they become unsourced changes if I revert and remove the source]
>Has the nerve to accuse them of disruptive editing via largely irrelevant canned text and/or a template
K.

I'm sure many will agree that that style of text has no place on Wikipedia (or many websites), however coming from myself, that's the way I'd like to put it. In all seriousness, I needed a break from this hellsite after learning that one doesn't have to be on an article with a highly contested subject matter (usually political) to run into entitled, revert happy users that can't seem to cite specific guidelines like WP:AIRPORT or WP:NOTTRAVEL in their edit summaries that the user seems to be violating (in which I wasn't, by the way), or to sign on a user's talk page. Seeing your edits get reverted afterward and you getting shut down when trying the same thing on the user who reverted you, has shown me that it's okay for myself to get right back into it.

On the subject:
• Through this canned text, you wished to discuss the content of my edits on articles you reverted...probably. As the one who rapidly reverted my edits and who had some sort of problem with the content I contributed, it's also on you to tell me what that is, and their specifics. You didn't, nor showed you were seeking consensus.

You seemed to enjoy using Wikipedia for these purposes; would you like to donate to Wikpedia in my stead this year (an otherwise annual donation) as well? ChainChomp2 (talk) 02:20, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ChainChomp2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anisec Luftfahrt logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image is now in order, many thanks! ChainChomp2 (talk) 06:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Primera Air, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billund (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Iberia (airline), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 02:38, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Of the editors I've seen on this website, you seem to be the only one to shut down Planespotters as a source by calling it unreliable, but between the times I've been reverted (and further up to now) I don't believe I've ever seen you lead by example and suggest an alternative, such as airfleets. Have you considered that Planespotters has its own system of submitting corrections with verifiable sources, such as articles or photographs before information is updated? Meanwhile there have been four Iberia A330-200s operating under Level since July, but it's telling that after all this time you'd rather leave Iberia (airline)'s fleet table unsynced with that of Level (airline brand)'s, while hiding behind more canned texts akin to Norwegian Air Shuttle's social platform customer service. The juxtaposition with the initial "welcome" on this talk page is ironic. ChainChomp2 (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JetSmart Argentina has been accepted

JetSmart Argentina, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Redalert2fan (talk) 11:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of JetBlue destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgetown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anisec Luftfahrt logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anisec Luftfahrt logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Silver Airways, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cat Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amended in revision as of 04:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC) for the purpose of records; cheers. ChainChomp2 (talk) 06:39, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited French Bee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Full service.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amended in revision as of 10:28, 18 August 2020 (UTC) for the purpose of records; cheers. ChainChomp2 (talk) 06:39, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air Do, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fukushima.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amended in revision as of 06:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC) for the purpose of records; cheers. ChainChomp2 (talk) 06:39, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP: BURDEN

Just to point out that it is the person who adds or changes detail that must back this up with citations. This is uncontroversial. It is clear that anyything that does not maybe indeed should be deleted. Those who do not reference detail properly are the lazy ones. It is not up to anyone else to tidy up after other people's mess. Andrewgprout (talk) 08:05, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think the {{cn}} tag exists? Though that's beside the point; this is more about how in the case that someone does provide one, the reverting party can suddenly decide that the content as a whole should not be added for an entirely new reason, before deleting it, tag-bombing with synthesis/original research templates, or sending threats to talk pages (or all of the above). This telegraphed and reactionary behavior succeeds if by being taken less and less seriously over time.

I would suggest perhaps mentioning up-front that you don't want certain content to be maintained, or even presented at all, though someone's done that already. ChainChomp2 (talk) 12:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norse Atlantic Airways (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Norse Atlantic Airways instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Norse Atlantic Airways and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Norse Atlantic Airways, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChainChomp2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notification, I have now contributed to the proposal at its talk page, or can begin the integration process myself if there is additional input necessary. ChainChomp2 (talk) 09:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Attitude

Please remember Wp:BURDEN is a thing. It is your responsibility to reference the detail you add, please do so. Anything not properly referenced can and should be deleted particularly if it is not particularly encyclopaedic detail. Getting shitty in your edit summaries is only hurting you. Maybe there are better things that you could be doing that adding unencyclopaedic detail to Wikipedia. Andrewgprout (talk) 07:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Airlines (Lynx)

I mixed up the historical and current fleets, adding them together. Planespotters is not a good reference. They are slow to update. A few days ago they showed 3 aircraft for Lynx and our article and Transport Canada showed 4. The fleet number reference should go in the infobox and there are multiple other references there. Things should not be bold as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting#When not to use boldface. 1263343 Alberta Inc. isn't a redirect so it's not in bold but "New Air & Tours" does redirect there so it is bold. References should be next to what they are referencing so the seats reference go with the passenger box. One thing I missed until now is that because Wikipedia is a generalist encyclopedia the link for aircraft should not go to the variant. In some cases the link to the variant leads to things like "Turbocharged version of the PA-39 Twin Comanche C/R" which is of no help to the general reader. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! While I hear you with the bolded text, some of the things incorporated in the article are still not standard (or common) practices, such as left-aligning text in fleet tables or smaller things (like displaying "Boeing 737 MAX" in the fleet table instead of "Boeing 737 MAX 8" since there's a MAX 7 through 10, but maybe this part was a typo in the display and it can certainly link to the 737 MAX article but display as MAX 8). When I checked the Infobox airline template documentation, I saw that it does list the "image2" parameter possibly suiting a photo to demonstrate livery, but more often than not I will see the infobox contain only the logo and any photos placed in the Fleet or History sections; although some cases either may occur where Air Canada's or WestJet's infoboxes only have the logo while Air Canada Express's or WestJet Encore's have an aircraft photo. In contrast there's how American Airlines, Delta Air Lines or United Airlines as well as their regional brands American Eagle (airline brand), Delta Connection and United Express contain only a logo image in theirs. WP:ALFC does list left-aligning text for the fleet tables, but again what I often see or say is that the column content is centered, like at Air Canada fleet or WestJet#Fleet. When I refer to them I'm indicating the formatting should be consistent, i.e. Lynx/Flair should (ideally) align left if the larger and more established articles do the same, or vice versa, but they center-align table text. As you might've seen, I was going to leave the aircraft photo in Flair's infobox and was not the one who most recently removed it, though I did place it in the Fleet section when re-adding it to the article given at least one other editor did not feel it belonged there. For aliasing citations in the infobox or even the article lead, again this seems to vary in practice from article to article or section to section, though part of what I discussed with a previous editor on the Lynx article involved the text body and sections doing most of the "citing" and the article's lead/infobox being a "summary" of this information, while specific things not restated like the AOC or codes/callsign may be cited if potentially "challenged" enough.

On some articles like EasyJet UK, Icelandair, Norse Atlantic Airways, or Play (airline), editors may often add the seating counts/configurations off seat maps on the reservation system, and they may not always have in-line citations, or simply list a primary reference for the entire section after just the section lead for the fleet (e.g. G-INFO), destinations (e.g. the airline's timetable or route map), or some companies like PLAY or Norse may not state each and every capacity outright outside of seat maps, or other citations in their articles may mention it. When it comes to citing, different editors may cite different Wikipedia guidelines, but the most prevalent "interpretation" I see is a citation is only needed if it's a claim that may more often than not be questioned, and even this can vary from user to user. (You can see in previous messages I've received here just how argumentative some are about "uncyclopedic content" or enforcing their own standards, or revert you until you cite something, but once you do, it's "uncyclopedic" and removed, even within the same "type" of information, but that's another subject and conversation.) Though whether an airline's aircraft seats "this" count or "that" count doesn't seem to be as "heated" a point of contention if the airline lists seat maps while booking (though it is nice that Flair and Lynx write a number somewhere on their website either way), or how these other articles may not cite for seat counts.

Concerning Planespotters, it can list aircraft as "parked", but with COVID-19 it became prevalent enough where I'd observe editors including "parked" aircraft in the "in service" columns but not "stored" aircraft (Breeze Airways or especially Norwegian Air Shuttle and the mess the latter can be to cite anything, fall under these examples of "parked" aircraft being included). Planespotters itself has a "verifying with citations" process on submitting information and changes for display, and its use on Wikipedia may or may not come from how various countries (such as Norway) do not always conveniently have an online aircraft register database to cite, even if countries like Canada or the United Kingdom do, though I suppose that isn't as relevant to this as it concerns Canada. For Lynx, Planespotters probably won't need to be referred to to concern the "current" fleet as much as the previous Enerjet one given the Transport Canada database can exist as a primary source for this purpose. The "parked" 737 MAX it refers to (C-FULJ) was just delivered to Lynx last week, but still retains the Norwegian livery of its originally intended customer. Planespotters is actually wrong or outdated to list it as parked in this respect, and probably assumed the aircraft would spend some days being parked to be rebranded, whereas the plane has been operating flights for the airline this past week despite not being rebranded yet (though it may be doing this in order to cancel fewer flights, as many of these MAX deliveries have been quite delayed).

Anyway I understand this was a lot to write or is to read or it may have gone all over the place, but I do appreciate reaching out to my talk page in this respect, and hope this discussion gives more of an idea that WikiProject or Wikipedia guidelines and individual editor's standards can conflict even just beyond myself. ChainChomp2 (talk) 16:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When I added the image2 to {{Infobox airline}} I was thinking of {{Infobox airport}} which frequently has a logo and an image of the airport. I've updated the Infobox airline as a picture of the headquarters or a ticket counter may be better. As far as I understand there is no requirement to be consistent throughout Wikipedia and I rarely edit airlines outside of Canadian ones. I see that Planespotters uses Transport Canada (TC). SO I think that the airline is a primary source for the fleet, TC is a secondary and Planespotters a tertiary source. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:34, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon Evolutions

Do you know where it aired in Japanese? It isn't on the official YT channel, so I'm wondering where it aired. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 08:08, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Wow Air destinations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Wow Air destinations, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Wow Air destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Silver Airways destinations

The article List of Silver Airways destinations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Violates WP:NOTDIRECTORY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 22:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm The Banner. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Málaga Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 23:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Keflavík International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The Banner talk 00:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Suvarnabhumi Airport, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You should by now be aware that you should not remove sources from routes that have started. The Banner talk 00:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Narita International Airport. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Same issue The Banner talk 00:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting threats, I can't tell if they're automated or canned; either way this reguritation of largely irrelevant text is more "disruptive" and patronizing than anything it's addressing, to the point I'm curious if you went through my edit history and skipped over edits that go against some of these fruitful accusations on my editing abilities in order to do so. Chances are, routes that have launched are going to have their references removed by someone else if not myself, given that over time, their operation arguably becomes less and less of a contested claim like what a citation would normally be associated with; if you are so insistent on whatever you're trying to impose, then perhaps you should find citations for every route in operation in every airport article in question. ChainChomp2 (talk) 05:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ever heard of a watchlist? And by now they are warnings. I am not an admin. The Banner talk 10:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds as though after returning from a break, that you "chose violence" as a certain meme goes. I did go to your Talk page initially before I was greeted with curiously well-cited instances of toxic behavior in targeting a user, so that told me there was little reason to take your regurgitation seriously. By all means, join the handful of users on this talk page in firing arbitrary allegations about various things but have it amount to little, if anything at all. ChainChomp2 (talk) 00:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just have a long watchlist. So today I noticed that you failed again in providing an independent source on Málaga Airport. One tiny sentence in a 36 page piece by the company itself. I hope you can replace it by an independent source soon. The Banner talk 11:22, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(don't use the) minor tag

Hi, I'd encourage you to not use the "minor" checkbox on your edits unless they truly qualify- see WP:MINOR. tedder (talk) 23:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds as though where the line is drawn is arbitrary and may differ from person to person; a lot of my edits can be things like extending citations (incorporating more information in them, such as author names, dates, the website/work), addressing typos, alphabetical ordering in tables, or other things like updating in the context of dates. These edits of mine come off to me as superficial and don't appear as though they would change the meaning of the article, but I would be open to other interpretations. Whereas other edits such as where I worked on multiple sections of the Air Japan or Norse Atlantic Airways articles, or redirecting List of Silver Airways destinations and its content to a section in the parent article (as it was nominated for deletion) I did not tag as a "minor" edit.

If you mean the recent edit on Breeze Airways where I added to a section with the information of a citation recently added, then having read through the guideline article, yes, I acknowledge that would have been a major edit improperly tagged as minor. The subsequent edit to similar information in List of Breeze Airways destinations however involved a layout change, and adding an author name and the name of the publication/website to a citation. The guideline article specifies adding/removing citations (presumably entire ones) rather than information within citations, therefore I would sooner interpret this particular edit as a minor one.

Either way I thank you for telling me and will take greater care about any liberal use of the minor tag. ChainChomp2 (talk) 00:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is subjective, and yeah, the most recent one was the one that seemed over the (arbitrary) line. Bad-faith editors will use it to try to sneak in a spam reference or change content, generally I figure if there're more than a couple of characters changed I'll probably review it to make sure it isn't a bad edit being hidden under a misleading edit description and the minor tag.

I think you're interpreting it correctly- or acceptably- most of the time. And you're an experienced editor, which is why I didn't just drop a warning template here. Thanks for your work. tedder (talk) 04:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]