Jump to content

User talk:Cgchapman/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Name of student reviewer Keronica Grant
Date of review 5/14/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Cgchapman
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Cgchapman
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/14/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/14/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) good length
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) N/A
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition Good grammar.
Other comments Good job!

Keronica Grant (talk) 05:12, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Case Study Pre-Edit Peer Review

[edit]
Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Ant_N_York
Date of review 5/14/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Cgchapman
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Cgchapman
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/14/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/14/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) good length
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) N/A
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition Good grammar.
Other comments Good job!


Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

[edit]
Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Neffateriet
Date of review 5/13/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Cgchapman
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Cgchapman
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/13/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/13/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Great length
Image (needed/appropriate) Not need
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Correct
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition No noticeable mistakes. Good grammar.
Other comments Good job!

Neffateriet (talk) 11:02, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

[edit]
Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Joselv83
Date of review 5/9/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Cgchapman
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Cgchapman
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good Length
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition No noticeable mistakes. Good grammar.
Other comments Great topic, good job!

Joselv83 (talk) 17:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

[edit]
Name of student reviewer: Keronica Grant
Date of review 5/1/2013
Name of editor Christina Chapman
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Cgchapman/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 04/24/13
Date review submitted to instructor 04/28/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) good Enough.
Image (needed/appropriate) None
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)
Wikiformatting Good Formatting
Grammar & composition Good grammar
Other comments Good topic.

--Keronica Grant (talk) 19:06, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: DJames5

Date of review- 5/6/13

Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**- Cgchapman

URL of editor’s Userpage- http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Cgchapman/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page- 5/6/13

Date review submitted to instructor- 5/6/13

Length of edit (too long/too short)- Too long Image (needed/appropriate)- n/a

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)- Accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed- Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych-) Yes

Wikiformatting- Good use of numbering

Grammar & composition- Good

Other comments- None DJames5 (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]






Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Christina GeoHaghan Wikipedia User: Christina geo
Date of review 5/1/2013
Name of editor Christina Chapman
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Cgchapman/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 04/24/13
Date review submitted to instructor 04/28/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Perfect edit length. Enough sentences.
Image (needed/appropriate) Not needed for topic being discussed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Yes
Wikiformatting Very Good Wiki Formatting
Grammar & composition Good grammar and composition. No mistakes noticed when read.
Other comments Good edit material and interesting topic picked.

--Christina geo (talk) 20:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Name of student reviewer: Chanae woodyard Wikipedia User: Nae0408
Date of review 5/11/2013
Name of editor Christina Chapman
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Cgchapman/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/11/13
Date review submitted to instructor 5/11/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) great
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate
Wikiformatting Good Formatting
Grammar & composition Good
Other comments Great job

Nae0408 (talk) 16:52, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Nae0408
Date of review 5/13/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User:Cgchapman
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Cgchapman/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/13/13
Date review submitted to instructor 5/13/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Information is Accurate to I/O Psych textbook
Wikiformatting Good formatting
Grammar & composition Good grammar and composition
Other comments Great job

Nae0408 (talk) 02:41, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pre edit peer review

[edit]
Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: Joan Bailey
Date of review 5/15/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Cgchapman
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Cgchapman/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/15/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/15/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) The length of the edit is Good.
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Information is accurate.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Information relates to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Formatting is good.
Grammar & composition Grammar and composition is good.
Other comments Nice!

Joan Bailey (talk) 19:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: Mtrowers
Date of review 5/15/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Cgchapman
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Cgchapman/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/15/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/15/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length, not too long
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Information is precise.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Information relates to I/O Psychology
Wikiformatting Good format.
Grammar & composition Good grammar.
Other comments Nice!

Mtrowers (talk) 15:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]