User talk:Cfbird1008/spitzer cross

Peer Review (Late)

Good Afternoon Casey,

Wow, I love what you have done so far. I don't really have any true critiques besides grammar because I think the placement of each section and its content are well done. It is quite comprehensive! I also like that you have included many pictures of your piece to give a more full view of it. Moreover, all of your sources appear credible and legitimate. Finally, your section on Symbolism was what I found to be most enlightening :)

For the small bit of critiques I do have, as I said they are mostly grammatical in nature. For example, there is a section detailing the dimensions that includes a citation before the end of the sentence. Generally those are placed at the very end of the sentence. Additionally, under the "Technique" section, there is a "Champleve" hovering above the bulk of the text. This might be an error resulting from formatting issues in the websites code, so I wasn't sure if that was on purpose, but I felt it was worth mentioning. Additionally, with regard to the Provenance and History section, it might be possible to merge the two to create a larger section, as there is some overlap between the two topics.

Good luck Casey, and I'm sorry my review took so long. Very Respectfully,

-Alex B. Blitz96 (talk) 21:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Blitz96 (talk) 21:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)