User talk:Celebrityreview

Conflict of interest

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mark Boardman, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Mark Boardman. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:45, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mark Boardman, you will be blocked from editing. In this edit you deliberately replaced accurate information with misinformation. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Boardman

A tag has been placed on Mark Boardman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:55, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate accounts?

Are you the same person as Celebritypresenter? JamesBWatson (talk) 15:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

... and/or TVfanaticlady (talk · contribs) ? JohnCD (talk) 08:51, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]