User talk:CedricElijahHenry
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Harv template
[edit]As in the North American A-36 Apache, please do not add the template as it is malformed and requires more work to correct for almost no gain. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC).
September 2011
[edit] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 1952 Bible Conference (Adventist) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Anirudh Emani (talk) 06:00, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- huh??? I improved the terrible referencing that existed. The cite templates were poorly done. And the sfn templates clean up the text and make editing easier. This is HIGHLY constructive... there is no way in the two minutes between when I posted and you posted that you even read what i did. CedricElijahHenry (talk) 06:04, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of EditCounterOptIn.js
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Scopecreep (talk) 05:51, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Reliable sources
[edit]As I've said on the talk page of Scriptural Geologist, it was decided that Mortenson was not a reliable source and that material from him should not be used. Please respect this decision. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 04:31, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Zejtun Corinthians F.C.
[edit]I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Zejtun Corinthians F.C., which you proposed for deletion, because I think that the deletion of this article may be controversial. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! KTC (talk) 11:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)