User talk:CeccarelliAstrid

October 2024

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Radomir Damnjanović Damnjan. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:58, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CeccarelliAstrid! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:44, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wrote my explanation on article talk page. CeccarelliAstrid (talk) 07:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, CeccarelliAstrid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Radomir Damnjanović Damnjan, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! bonadea contributions talk 16:58, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

as an expert in the art history field, I just wanted to make article about Damnjan's work accurate, precise, complete, and well-referenced in Wikipedia, I'm not sure how is that in conflict with Wikipedia’s goals. Please give me suggestions about what you want me to change in the articla, so we can make It usable and live.

Thank you! CeccarelliAstrid (talk) 07:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]