Jump to content

User talk:Cec2i2l0i9a8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fabiola Kim (March 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cabrils (talk) 00:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Cec2i2l0i9a8! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 00:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Fabiola Kim has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fabiola Kim. Thanks! Cabrils (talk) 22:20, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hi Cec2i2l0i9a8! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Fabiola Kim was accepted

[edit]

Congrats! Ca talk to me! 09:49, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pamela Pugh (August 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Voorts was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
voorts (talk/contributions) 17:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pamela Pugh has been accepted

[edit]
Pamela Pugh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

voorts (talk/contributions) 00:32, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]