User talk:Cbassford1
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as O. J. Matthijs Jolles, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.clausewitz.com/CWZHOME/Bassford/Chapter19.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:O. J. Matthijs Jolles. Then you should do one of the following:
- Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:O. J. Matthijs Jolles where we can find that note; or
- Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:O. J. Matthijs Jolles.
It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! TheRingess 05:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Dear Ringess:
Reference your message regarding copyright, I am the author and copyright holder of the information I supplied from my book, Christopher Bassford, Clausewitz in English: The Reception of Clausewitz in Britain and America, 1815-1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), and I am the owner and editor of www.clausewitz.com, where the full text of the book is displayed at http://www.clausewitz.com/CWZHOME/Bassford/TOC.htm. I have sent an e-mail to Wikipedia Permissions to this effect from my clausewitz.com e-mail. I actually rewrote the piece substantially for Wikipedia, though obviously not enough to escape your eagle eyes. I have also attempted to wikify it, insofar as I understand your requirements. I retain copyright on the book, but freely give you whatever permissions you wish to display the sections I contributed to Wikipedia under the GFDL. I inserted a note to that effect at the end of my contribution on Jolles. Please let me know if this is adequate.
BTW, I too am interested in fractals and in nonlinearity generally, and this interest connects to Clausewitz. Alan Beyerchen wrote a great piece explaining the value of interpreting Clausewitz's theories through the lenses of nonlinearity and Compleity theory--this is perhaps IMHO the most important article published on Clausewitz in the past twenty years. See Alan D. Beyerchen , "Clausewitz, Nonlinearity and the Unpredictability of War," International Security, 17:3 (Winter, 1992), pp. 59-90. This article is also available in French: "Clausewitz: Non Linéarité et Imprévisibilité de la Guerre," Theorie, Littérature, Enseignement, 12 (1994), pp165-98.
Battle of Waterloo
[edit]I reverted out your edit, because the reference section is a list that identifies fully sources used as short citation within the article (see WP:CITE). As the book you added is not cited within the article it should not appear in the references section. -- PBS (talk) 00:50, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carl von Clausewitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frederick II. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Fonts for Linear B/Mycenaean Greek
[edit]Hi, you've emailed me asking for guidance on viewing Mycenaean Greek/Linear B characters. This is the relevant help page/guide; go to the relevant section, download font(s) & install. Feel free to ask for more help if more is needed.
Thanatos|talk|contributions 01:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi again, replying to your second email:
You said that the situation has greatly improved but that there are still real glitches. I do not know whether I could help unless you elaborate on what those glitches/problems are.
Thanatos|talk|contributions 13:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)- Hi again, replying again:
Please explain in writing and in detail
-and if you also need, as you've said, to post image-attachments, use some image site like this, copying also the link thereto-
what seems to be the problem, so that a solution might be provided, if possible.
PS Please respond here and not by email.
Thanatos|talk|contributions 13:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi again, replying again:
From CBassford1: OK, I created a page at http://www.clausewitz.com/CButility/LinearBissue.htm that shows the issues.
- If the posted screenshots represent what you're seeing now then nothing is fixed because all of what you're seeing "right" is pictures/images of text, not fonts/text per se; e.g. on screenshot 3, the GOAT ideogram inside the table is text, while the RAM one is an image (see wikicode or simply hover your mouse over these two).1
- You haven't elaborated on what's your setup, i.e. OS etc.. Anyway in short, if you've indeed installed the necessary fonts (try also installing damase and code2001), try seeing whether changing encoding/font settings on your browser fixes anything (e.g. set UTF-8 as default) but to be frank the only possible solution or 'solution' I've found is trying a different web-browser (or OS+Browser).
Afaict proper rendering of these scripts is OS+Browser dependent; e.g. I recall (I no longer use this setup) that 32bit Firefox on Win 7 32bit rendered them fine; but neither 32bit nor 64bit Firefox (as of v.44) renders them properly (basically not at all; only said squares) on a Win 7 SP1 64bit setup; nor for that matter - on said OS - does IE 11; but Chrome (64bit v.48....) does. Moreover, sometimes there is simply no solution at all (at least that I know of), an example thereof being Android phones in which case it's simply better to forget it; Android does not support - in most cases and system-wide on non-rooted devices - proper polytonic Greek rendering, let alone Linear B. - 1. On the other hand, on screenshot 1, the lack of a ji character is not a problem because there is no relevant syllabogram and hence no wikicode (contrary to this, there is a ju; see under Untranscribed and doubtful values)...
Thanatos|talk|contributions 21:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
CBassford1: Stupid of me not to notice those were graphics, not characters. Running Windows 10. OK, next try. I downloaded/installed the code2001 and mph_2b_damase fonts. This had absolutely no effect in FireFox 43.0.4 or MS Explorer 11. However, I installed Chrome and it works. See the bottom screenshot at . http://www.clausewitz.com/CButility/LinearBissue.htm
- So the same problem persists in Windows 10? Nice regression; yet another reason not to go - MS/OS-wise, that is - beyond Win 7... :D
I recall trying to find a solution when migrating from Win 7 32bit to Win 7 64bit; from what I recall, it seems that 1.MS changed something system-wise, 2. both IE and Firefox pull somehow the relevant font/encoding settings from the OS while Chrome doesn't; hence...
Unfortunately the state of inter alia ancient scripts rendering does not seem to be a high priority to most code developers and relevant companies; see yet another example I've run into.
Anyway yes, that's the proper rendering so it seems that you're now fine; glad I was able to help. CU
Thanatos|talk|contributions 06:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
CBassford1 Thanks, Thanatos666! You'd think something called "Unicode" would have made this a non-problem. Glad to know you're on the case.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Cbassford1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Cbassford1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Cbassford1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)