User talk:Cawseases

Olympic openers

You're suppose to bring your concerns to the talkpage of the article-in-question. Not edit war for what you want. GoodDay (talk) 22:07, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

joe biden not even living to 2028 Cawseases (talk) 16:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

and how can you think you know whose going to open the olympics 10 years from now? Cawseases (talk) 16:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll let the future speak for itself Cawseases (talk) 16:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barack Obama, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 01:52, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kunduz hospital strike Cawseases (talk) 03:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions. Acroterion (talk) 01:30, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at George Floyd protests. Kire1975 (talk) 01:32, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not vandalization, there's no inequality Cawseases (talk) 01:33, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's inappropriate discussions? not repeating the same political views Wikipedia wants me to? Cawseases (talk) 01:33, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kire1975 (talk) 01:44, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:45, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cawseases (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Political motivations are not justification for blocksCawseases (talk) 22:38, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First, that shows a failure to assume good faith. Second, all your edits up till this one were perfectly fine, if a little cranky. Then they went off the cliff. What changed? Maybe you don't want to say, maybe you don't even really know. In any event, doing that sort of thing in a contentious topic area exposes you to stricter sanctions, and that's what happened. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:33, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Failure to assume good faith? That's a bit ironic, isn't it?