User talk:CauseIsayso

Please remember to follow Wikipedia guidelines for editing pages: This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should not be inserted and if present, must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other concerns about the biography of a living person, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to the subject of this article and need help with issues related to it, please see this page.

April 2010

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Howard Matz. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. THF (talk) 09:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This is a single-purpose account dedicated to edit-warring over including an unacceptable link in one particular article. When pressed not to do this, you resorted to a personal attack via copy-and-pasting someone else's userpage.

Having reviewed your contributions to Wikipedia, I can't see any positive contributions at all, simply disruption. For that reason, I've blocked you from editing Wikipedia indefinitely. If you wish to contest this block, you can add {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page and someone will be right with you. ⇦REDVƎRS⇨ 09:30, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CauseIsayso (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

/That single link on the page was in an arbitrary manner deleted, by multiple sources as documented here. How nice that the government may have a selective voice, but not the people. And for the record I am the owner of the site and the subject being discussed. While I did copy-and-paste my censor's user page it was only to get his atttention, not to harm or damage. Unlike the harm and damage he and his buddy's selective censorship cause by silencing an alternative view point through my external link on the history of Howard Matz. Their origial removals of the externaml link are more vandalism then anything I am accused of doing here. My right is to put out an alternative view point, based and backed up on verifiable facts. Thank you.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Syrthiss (talk) 12:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.