User talk:Cathparr

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cathparr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Cathparr (talk) 08:34, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed. Talk page access revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 08:49, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Wiki senior admins

why am I being bullied by 3 members known RICHARD3120, SJO, BONDEAUX, firstly BONDEAUX ACCUSED ME OF SOCK BECAUSE I CHALLENGED THEM TO DISPROVE MY EDIT, THEY COULDNT AND THEN THREATEN ME THEY WOULD HAVE ME BLOCKED IN WHICH THEY SUCCEEDED, THIS IS BULLING AND DIGUSTING BEHAVIOUR, I HAVE NEVER VANDLISED A PAGE AND IF YOU COULD BE BOTHERED CHECKING MY CONTRIBUTION, YOU WILL SEE I MADE ON MINOR SPELLING EDITS THIS IS NOT VANDLISUM.

SECONDLY IF YOU CHECKED MY CONTRIBTUIONS YOU WILL SEE YESTERDAY I SUBMITTED A SOURCE STATING BROS THE TIME SOLD 3 MILLION COPIES, THIS SOURCE CAME FROM THE TIME ALBUM IT'S SELF AND FROM A JAPANESE ADVERTISMENT, PLUS ALSO FROM 3 OTHER SOURCES, RICHARD3120 UNDID THE SOURCE GIVING NO VAILD REASON, SO I UNDID THEIR EDIT STTAING FOR THEM TO DISPROVE, ALL OF SUDDEN SJO UNDID MY REVISION. sjo and Richard3120 are the same person you can see this BY CHECKING loads of other pages they edit, they bully members especially new members. then all of sudden bandeaux threaten me stating that he could not disprove my edit but went onto SAY I must not edit this page, this IS bulling which is not allowed on wiki.

you will see the only thing I did wrong was undid edits 5 times and for that I'm sorry as I did not know their was 3 limit revert edit clause. but I can see that richard3120 and sjo and bandeaux have all undid edits more than 3 times on other pages and other members have undid revert more than 3 times. I find it un professional that editors can bully new members, when the new member has actually submitted the correct source. richard2130 and sjo have vandalised so many pages and they get away with even though they never disprove the edits their reverting, and now its seem after discussing this matter in forum that these 3 members have had over 500 members band from wiki , im shocked.

I learnt wiki is unsafe and the content on most pages are in fact untrue because of certain editors. my block is unfair and allows editors to bully others, if you block is because I undid edits 5 times that im sorry but im new and we all have to learn, but if your block because of editors making false claims because their challenged then wiki is joke.