User talk:Catawba43/sandbox
1. The article presents info well and in an understandable way. All headings are explained well and accurate to its section. The first sentence described the species very well.
2. I suggest that they paraphrase more instead of using just direct quotes almost the whole article to present the information. This will make it more understandable and easy to read. It also needs to use italics when using the species name. There are also no refere
3. I think that the sources could be used better and that there should be fewer direct quotations.
4. I feel as if I could use better descriptions for my own, which is something they do well.
5. They do meet the criteria for 1,200 (1235)