User talk:Cat-five/Archive 2013
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Cat-five. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 2010 | Archive 2011 | Archive 2012 | Archive 2013 | Archive 2014 | Archive 2015 | → | Archive 2020 |
A tag has been placed on File:Hercegovacko Neretvanski kanton - edit.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cat-fivetc ---- 07:45, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Note, auto-created by Twinkle while deleting an image I uploaded, thus why it was me notifying myself. Keeping so I have a record of the request should I ever need it. Cat-fivetc ---- 22:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Autorecessive.svg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 00:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
|
Re:
No worries Cat-five :) -- Nbound (talk) 23:24, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
FPC template
I replied to you at Wikipedia_talk:Featured_picture_candidates#Possible_routes regarding a single large template, which is hidden in a collapsed box called "Option 2 template". Feel free to glance over it. I created a new sub-section regarding the archival process. There seems to be no immediate reason to change to one large template, which would require being rewritten on the coding level (I cannot do this, I have a very basic understanding of it), but if you have any comments about it, feel free to leave them. If you aren't fussed about it either way, feel free to say so as well :D Thanks! – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 03:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- I took a look at it and suggested a new variation to the template. I have never actually worked on or closely looked at the code behind the nomination template so my idea might not be feasible but I strongly feel that making the process as clear and idiot-proof as possible, especially when consolidating, is well worth the time and effort. I saw you are going to be gone for the next couple of days and I think if we rush the process the consensus and the quality of whatever is agreed upon will suffer so please just look at it and comment at your convenience, even if it isn't until you get back. Even if I start tinkering before then (and if I do I'll make sure to leave a note on the FPC talk page to my sandbox) It's doubtful that anything will come of it for quite some time. Cat-fivetc ---- 08:01, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your responses! Someone went ahead and did a bold delist-in-the-candidates maneuver and it's the easiest way to proceed. With the lack of lively discussion, I get the feeling most people don't want this to be complicated. So a single template will probably just be a nuisance. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 16:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Queen Elizabeth's corgis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- the [[2012 Summer Olympics opening ceremony|2012 Olympic opening ceremony ]] when [[James Bond]] (portrayed by [[Daniel Craig]] arrived at [[Buckingham Palace]] to escort the Queen to the event.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:54, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Fixed with this diff. Cat-fivetc ---- 06:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Fixed-point combinator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Y combinator
- Y Combinator (company) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Y combinator
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Cat-five, an alternate version of the FPC “Red Tape” has been added. Thank you.-Godot13 (talk) 00:00, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tater Tots may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- '''Tater Tots''', a registered [[trademark]] of [[Ore-Ida]] (a division of the [[H. J. Heinz Company]], are fried slices of potatoes. A tater tot is a [[side
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:02, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Added a closing bracket that I missed Cat-fivetc ---- 17:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
