User talk:Castroyesid
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Castroyesid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm R9tgokunks. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! R9tgokunks ✡ 01:00, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Edit summaries
[edit]Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!R9tgokunks ✡ 01:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Ontario
[edit]Hi. The correct transcription of Ontario is /ɒnˈtɛərioʊ/. Transcriptions linking to Help:IPA/English are diaphonemic, which means that they accomodate multiple varieties of English at once. In UK for instance, the name would never be pronounced with /æ/, only /ɛə/. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 20:57, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Castroyesid. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Castroyesid,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 16:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Castroyesid,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Castroyesid,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for December 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kitsai language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labiovelar consonant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Phonological tables
[edit]Please stop messing around with the phonological tables. If you want to add other information on the phonology, that is fine, but please just leave the tables alone. They were fine the way they were before with sourced information. Fdom5997 (talk) 00:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Add: Things would be easier if you left an edit summary (this has been explained before!), so we can consider the rationale of your edits. Even if an edit is correct, the burden lies on you to show why it is correct, either by providing sources, or by specifying which source has been cited incorrectly in the previous version. –Austronesier (talk) 08:32, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]December 2020
[edit]Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to European colonization of the Americas. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 04:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at European colonization of the Americas, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 04:44, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hello thank you for your message. I apologize for the mistake, it is not my intention to add personal analysis. May I ask which part(s) are being misinterpreted as personal commentary? I am happy to rephrase my edit, but I rephrased two of the first three paragraphs and I believe the bulk of what I added was factual, not subjective commentary. I apologize if this is not the correct way to reply to these messages, I am still rather new to interacting with other users on wikipedia. Thank you for your time. Best regards, Yesid.
- Firstly, please make an effort to indent and sign your talk page messages. Thank you. The lede section of an article is there to summarize and distill the body of the article as an overview for readers. It is not the place for a biased rendering of history with words such as "plunder" and "environmental racism". Wikipedia has a policy on neutrality in articles. Please familiarize yourself with it. Elizium23 (talk) 04:59, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello thank you again for your response. I do not know what you mean by "make an effort to indent and sign your talk page messages" I apologize and thank you for your patience. I understand wikipedia's policy on neutrality and I am happy to rephrase my sentence. "The European colonization of the Americas typically refers to the time period following the voyages of Christopher Columbus in 1492—centuries after the first wave of Europeans colonization in the Americas—during which various western European empires began their plunder of the human and natural resources of the Americas" is what I originally had—how does this sound instead? "The European colonization of the Americas typically refers to the time period following the voyages of Christopher Columbus in 1492—centuries after the first wave of European colonization in the Americas—during which various western European empires began to explore and claim the natural resources and human capital of the Americas"
As for the phrase "environmental racism"—I did not include that phrase in my edit. In the sentence "This time period is marked by intense conflict stemming from the doctrine of discovery, as well as by the establishment of settler-colonial states such as Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Argentina, and the United States which have extracted the natural resources of the existing indigenous nations into the 21st century" I linked to the Wikipedia article on environmental racism because there are sections in that article that describe various policies and their effects on the indigenous people of the Americas that are relevant to the discussion of the extraction of natural resources that has taken place since the start of colonization—and the article includes 21st century examples, which is what the linking text referenced. Apologies, is this inappropriate? And is there anything else that is objectionable? Like I said I am happy to remove any point of view commentary—it is not at all my intention to violate wikipedia's neutrality policy—but I like to think I meaningfully contributed to wikipedia with my edit and would like to see at least some of the detail I added to those two paragraphs remain :-) Thank you again for your time and patience. Best regards, Yesid.
October 2021
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vernon, California, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:43, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)