User talk:Castanea dentata

; Shut me.
	Old talk has been taken down into the Keep.; ;

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Castanea_dentata.

Welcome!

Awwwww, my first barnstar! Thanks, it means a lot to me. (eight-clap!) :) Elonka 02:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You certainly earned it! This is also the first one I have given. I just figured out how. - C. dentata

02:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with other Wikipedia efforts. BTW, if you want to check which page that a template is currently being used on, go to the template's page, and click on the "What links here" link in the lefthand menu. That'll give you an idea of which pages may need tweaking. Elonka 17:55, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JWs

Haven't you seen how I structured this section? Beliefs are presented from the JW pov. Your style of writing is not in a fair or sympathetic tone to the JW's. That is a requirement. joshbuddy^talk 17:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are violating Wikipedia rules and guidelines. As you know, all articles must be neutral. Although you claim not to be a member of this organization, all your edits without exception deliver the Jehovah's Witnesse minority point of view without proper evaluation. This is unacceptable. Wikipedia is not free advertizing space for unusual groups and belief systems. - Cestus ^Cd

19:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tobit

Please read the 6th and 7th pages of the following PDF file on the names of the protagonists of Tobit; they are labelled pages 4 and 5 of to the Reader: [1].

Rwflammang 13:57, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Codex vaticanus colour.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Codex vaticanus colour.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 19:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand

If you wish to undue my edits, that is your perogative! My edits aren't always perfect, so I need all the help I can get! :)

However, removing an afd notice is contary to wikipedia policy. It is now up to an admin to do that, please review the deletion policy.

Sethie (talk) 09:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Liite Buddhism. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Kusma (talk) 09:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are mistaken. There was an edit conflict. Are you saying that you removed my comments? Castanea dentata (talk) 09:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the AfD notice from Liite Buddhism. Please don't do that again, but comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liite Buddhism. Thank you, Kusma (talk) 09:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, Sethie is not an Admin. Are you saying that you refuse to abide by Wikipedia policy against Three Reverts and mass deletions?!! Castanea dentata (talk) 10:07, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted as copyright violation per WP:CSD#G12, so this is now pretty moot. Kusma (talk) 10:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My appologies

I made a BIG whopping initial mistake- I mispelled Liite Buddhism when I did a google search and found no refferences for it. I honestly thought it was a hoax! :)

Since then, I looked at the article and found, from my perspective, some very serious problems. Perhaps I did not go about pointing out those "problems" or fixing them in the most conduicive to harmony way. I got hot-headed, impulsive and a little righteous.

The good news is that thanks to my Afd- others will look at the page- and voice their imput. It will break the stalemate between the two of us.

I am going to let some other people chime in about the page before making more edits.

peace, Sethie (talk) 10:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see. Alright then. Yes I agree that the article needed polishing, but that is normal for new articles. I will help you work on it. Castanea dentata (talk) 10:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warnings

When warning a user not to vandalize, please don't use {{vandalism}}, as you did to Sethie. That template is intended for marking pages created as vandalism, so that they can be deleted. Please use a template from the {{uw-vandalism}} family instead. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You went above and beyond

Thanks CD, for sticking up for my article. I hope it didn't cause you too much trouble. Wyeson 10:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article to be deleted

HELP. This article to be deleted in id.wiki. Can you help me to SAY KEEP in its Talk page, in Indonesia Wikipedia. I don't know why they don't appreciate Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, and Assembly. Thanks for your support. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

redirected local churches to local churches (affiliation)

Hi Castanea,

I have reverted one of your edit as hardly anyone on wiki would type "Local churches (affiliation)" to be able to get to the article. I know there is a link in the disamb page but then the #redirected page, Local church is an article in itself just like Local churches (affiliation). Also, the new naming of the article Local churches was done as pr Wiki guidelines. Let me know what you thoughts are about it. Thanks, HopeChrist (talk) 16:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anglican Navbox

An anon IP reverted to an earlier version with no explation. I undid the revert and encourage you to join in a discussion on the template's talk page about inclusion and exclussion of articles. -- Secisek (talk) 20:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yaw.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yaw.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yaw.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yaw.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jehovah's Witnesses project

I have started a discussion regarding the content wikipedia has regarding the Jehovah's Witnesses at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses#Comments regarding template and project. Seeing that you are listed as a member of that project, I would appreciate any responses to the material there you would like to make. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fertile Crescent myth (Mesopotamia)

Template:Fertile Crescent myth (Mesopotamia) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mesopotamian myth (50)

Template:Mesopotamian myth (50) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Axem Titanium (talk) 19:02, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Chestnut.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Scott • talk 17:49, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Given your extensive history here at Wikipedia, there's no reason to imagine that you created this account as a sockpuppet; it's pretty clear that someone compromised your account and that of Wighson. If for some reason you want to come back, request an unblock and we can figure out what to do. Nyttend (talk) 03:10, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Castanea dentata. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jehovah complex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jehovah complex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jehovah complex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AtlasDuane (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]