User talk:Cartwarmark

This user is dedicated to
cleaning up vandalism.

Thanks!

So I regularly check back on my AfD comments, as I really feel it's about discussing things. It's never very much fun, especially with one like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Brandt (13th nomination), but I want to be sure I'm doing the right thing. It was thus a great pleasure to see your note thanking me for describing my reasoning. Normally the only feedback I get is argument, so I really appreciate the effort. Thanks, William Pietri 02:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F. Thank you. Delivered on behalf of user:xaosflux 03:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attack

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on this page, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because the article is a page created primarily to disparage its subject or a biography of a living person that is controversial in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral point of view version in the history to revert to. (CSD G10).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting the article, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate the article itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. CSDWarnBot 00:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy declined. Not an attack article. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 01:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sentinel Management Group is not to be deleted

Sorry for the confusion. The Speedy deletion was declined by the reviewing admin. He points out in his edit summary, as you do on the talk page that the article is well documented. I apologise for what was an error in tagging the article for speedy deletion and the trouble it has caused you. The article is not to be deleted. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 01:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wide Area Tracking System for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wide Area Tracking System is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wide Area Tracking System until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 08:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]