User talk:Carolyn1888

This user is a cheesehead.

This user lives in or is from Madison.

52YThis Wikipedian was born on 16 August 1972 and is 52 years, 3 months, and 9 days old.

Please be nice and patient with this New Wikipedian.

This user is female.

Margaret Ellen 16:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Carolyn1888 (talk) 10:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

My Edit Summaries: Hurricane Diana, Sandahl, Street Fighting, my talk pages. Other edits are pending (whenever we get recognized for partnering via Mediacom's Proxy Serve). Margaret Ellen 19:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Carolyn1888 (talk) 10:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Substandard Evidence and Studies

Diabetes studies are false for multiple reasons! Please look really closely, because the reality indicates Type One develops in adult citizens more prevalent than people can imagine! There are approximately eight million people under Diabetes T1 (Type One) residing in the United States! Contrary to normal beliefs, people after age thirty are developing Type One (and even into their seventies)!!! Something must change about studies of diabetes 'cause these nonchalant and casual attitudes cannot continue! Too many diabetes studies are outdated, concentrated under heavy matters of outdated evidence! We should look closer at Type One in adults beyond 30 years old and create new studies!

Margaret Ellen 15:47, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Margaret Ellen 06:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

To Whosoever This Concerns

Something is dead wrong folks. My partners-Marthaerin1812, Tropicalstormshirley, Barbara1888, Standingout-got tangled in sockpuppets' scandals and accused of abuse by sockpuppets somehow. Please, give us information regarding why people say we are sock puppet when facts mean we would never vandalize or abuse accounts or intimidate people or use personal attacks toward anybody! And Wikipedia has mentioned that she's Free Encyclopedia, but when we perform our edits on any article we get chills and scares because of editors saying "Please do not" statement, accused of vandalism which is strongly not our intention whatever and is completely false. It's highly complicated to get sources for the wikipedia that are correct and accurate. Whatever did we do to deserve all this? Please tell us. We would never make any edits in ways which damage Wikipedia! This indefinite blocking is unfair! And does indefinitely mean seventeen years plus, thirty years, forever or permanently?! We're very scared! Why should people put us on block for phoney and trumped up "sockpuppet" reason?! We're real people-Undercovergals gave us our accounts to disguise our real identity! How can you accuse us of socking when people who give out their real names are under risk for harassment?! Help us please. Margaret Ellen 14:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, it looks like you guys have made this edit many times under multiple accounts. This is vandalism.  Mm40 (talk | contribs)  14:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

How is that vandalizing? Margaret Ellen 14:31, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

That street fighting piece you are referring to happened being very important because the region we live under has multiple street fights and gang violence through the are and we thought the message of education we produced would be really helpful. Was that not helpful? Margaret Ellen 14:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Um, we are here to build an encyclopedia, not a how-to or offering advice, as that breaks the neutral point of view. Continuing to re-add material such as this is seen as vandalism and edit-warring. :-) Stwalkerster [ talk ] 15:06, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice my dear. We should have known maybe we would have not gotten blocked. Margaret Ellen 16:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC) Margaret Ellen 02:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carolyn1888 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

We'll be back in three to eleven years, though it's more likely three to eight years. In the meantime we got the views of our University to get into. We are multiple Midwestern State Meat Puppet editors who edit Wikipedia for GOOD cause even if not many people agree. How could we prove that when we return later to edit Wikipedia again that we're not vandalizers or bad editors in the area?

Decline reason:

Not a request for unblocking. On point, the easiest way to show other editors that you intend not to vandalize would be... wait for it... not to vandalize. Even if the information you add is accurate, it's still vandalism if it is non-neutral, not back by sources, and added repeatedly by multiple editors despite warnings. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 13:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{adminhelp}} Retiring until around November 2011 (earliest) to 2019 (the latest date) due to Administration members saying my edit group and I broke rules under editing on Wikipedia. Administrators are making people feel unwelcome as new editors, so retirement for my partners/me official starting tonight 8pm CDT (Minneapolis Time). Unable to convince certain admins that we're meat puppet (or separate people working together) rather than sock puppet.

We are University Students and I do not like when people say mean things when we edit Wikipedia. How can people say no attacks on the persons who said something to us when these admins keep personally attacking us? Something does not make sense, so, help me out.

Please protect until September 28 2015 but leave everything on this talkpage intact-please do not delete-I cannot have the real vandalism put on this page by people editing Wikipedia that are actual vandals. Thanks. Wikipedia Club. Goodbye until our eventual return for Wikipedia Edits.

You can always leave notes on my pages while we are taking Wikibreak-be positive though, no personal attacks. And safeguard the talkpage while we attend college stuff. Please leave detail intact.

Wikipedia Club

Umm. you have broken rules while editing here. Nevertheless, I have indefinitely semi-protected your talk page, which should keep it safe from vandalism. However, you and all established users will still be able to edit it. L'Aquatique[parlez] 03:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)