User talk:CarolusJosephus

User talk:Oxonian2006/Archive

Audrey Mullender

In reply to your message, you are quite correct - she is not a faculty member of the University of Oxford, or indeed associated with it in any way. That was a mistake on my part, due to my lack of understanding of the nature of Ruskin College. Thank you for noticing and correcting it. Terraxos (talk) 16:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DDs

Wrt DDs: I'd be interested, too, as I'm always curious when I come across an acronym I can't immediately decipher. A bit of Googling didn't turn up a likely answer, so I asked at the Reference desk. See Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language#DDs. Dorftrottel (ask) 20:46, April 30, 2008

Henry Chadwick

You may (or may not) rememebr that you once said that Henry Chadwick (theologian) badly needed work. Well, I've had a go, and I'm half thinking of putting it up for GA, so I' appreciate some fresh eyes on it before I kick that process off. David Underdown (talk) 14:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Adès

Hi, I'm afraid I don't know anything about the surname. All I remember is that there were different pronunciations going around (ADD-es, a-DES, even Addis!). And, alas I'm no longer in touch with people who might know. Sorry. Meanwhile I've brought the degree description in line with other articles such as Alain de Botton. Better? Yours Mattmm (talk) 19:45, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Helen Taylor

I'm confused. What is "the more obvious way"? If there's an alternative, I'm quite happy to hear it, but my concern was that I don't think we can justify separate articles for her children purely on the basis that it makes the succession boxes look nicer. As for "Lady Helen Melons", I have no idea what you're talking about. I think you must be confusing me with someone else. Proteus (Talk) 11:39, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. That makes more sense! And I agree, it does rankle. As for the succession box, I also think that's a viable solution. I'm not particularly bothered by the exact format, as long as the required information is put across. Proteus (Talk) 13:41, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 23:53, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Skylor Haagensen

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Skylor Haagensen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 03:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Degree awarding powers

Hi, I'm afraid I've no rigorous proof of this... though there was a reference to it in The Times recently... but then journalists are certainly fallible. The article mentioned that there were a few colleges that had been granted the power to award degrees (possibly through having their own Charter?) but never used these powers. However, with no hard proof I won't swear by it or place it any Wiki articles. Presumably you attended Oxford?

I am not sure of the validity of the "Registered Bodies" link - for example it lists Goldsmiths College, though this is a constituent college of the University of London that cannot award its own degrees.--Zoso Jade (talk) 22:59, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nature of degree ceremonies

I've just seen your interesting note on my talk page comparing practices at SOAS and Oxford. To take your points in no particular order certainly it is also the case at Cambridge that the same degree cannot be conferred twice - for example if a student undertakes examinations for the degree of MPhil twice in two different subject then, on passing the second examination, he would be given a certificate by the Secretary of the University's Board of Graduate Studies certifying that he had passed the examination. He would not have the degree conferred on him again. The argument that being two identical degrees is conceptually silly is easier to make if the language of "admitted to the degree of ..." is used: if you are being admitted to a status within a university then how can you be admitted to it again? Cambridge, like Oxford, does not classify its degrees. It classifies the marks in examinations (so that, in Cambridge, you can have a different class in each Part of a Tripos examination).

So far as London is concerned, I believe that its governance arrangements has recently changed. But its current Statute 16 says that each college "shall be entitled to award degrees of the University, and (provided it has power to do so) may award its own degrees subject to any protocols that the Board of Trustees may establish." - so it sounds as only the college is needed to award a UoL degree now. But so far as your own case is concerned it looks to me as though you're entirely right. Savirr (talk) 13:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of Oxford people

Hello again. I've been rather remiss at assisting you with the Oxford people lists, but have been concentrating on Jesus College lists. You may therefore find various new names awaiting you at List of alumni of Jesus College, Oxford and List of Principals and Fellows of Jesus College, Oxford. Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 07:19, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anglican Bishops

I always put that they are a stub, and when I go back to them I very often find someone has improved the article in some way: that is the nature of Wikipedia. Bashereyre (talk) 16:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Italics

I guess if I have any thinking at all it is that there would not be enough material to write an article, but nevertheless it may have something available - either on-line, or from a reference library. I am not sure when you started editing, but the site went through a period when quite unbelievable articles were getting deleted and I guess I saw little point in putting things in red. Personally I would love to see articles on Anglican Training Colleges and other institutions related to the key figures in the Church's history. Bashereyre (talk) 07:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Prince

I take your points about his Oxford days, all the info comes from Stephen Mansfield's biography. Mansfield's American and an expert on Pentecostalism rather than on Oxford, so perhaps he slipped up on some details. Please amend as you see fit.R Bartholomew (talk) 12:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

The article you created: Aloysius (Waugh) may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aloysius (Waugh).

The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{Findsources3}}:

Find sources for Aloysius (Waugh): google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:

1. List the page on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.

2. At any time, you can ask any administrator to move your article to a special page. (Called userfication)

3. You can request a mentor to help you: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.

4. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. These acronyms don't need to intimidate you. Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: Deletion debate acronyms, which will help you argue that the article should be kept.

If your page is deleted, you also have many options available. Good luck! Ikip (talk) 21:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Tosh

You are quite right of course, the trouble is I do not know which route to his degrees John Tosh took. I merely repeated the bald information contained about his degrees on his staff profile page at Roehampton. What is in the Wikipedia article about him is therefore factually accurate. I agree it might be a better if the details about incoporation etc. could be made explicit. I do not have that information however and short of writing to Prof. Tosh and asking, I am not sure how we could go about finding out. --Graham Lippiatt (talk) 18:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Italics

Thank you Oxonian 2006, I shall avoid the italics: sorry I had forgotten. As to people's full names, I don't mind if other people redirect my articles. It's still the best site on the internet Bashereyre (talk) 19:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rhianna Pratchett

Apologies, you're right; I misread the list. I'll correct my comment. (I still think the article should be kept, though.) Robofish (talk) 01:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Nossiter

Yes Oxonian2006, I may well have got a few things wrong. I looked for the original article I used (LSE Alumni publication) but could not find it. I guess you did not know him but he was a wonderful man. How he would have loved the current political crisis. I cannot say I was surprised he did not make particularly old bones: I have never seen anyone smoke quite so much as he did. Bashereyre (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Privy Councillors

Sorry ... I did think that everybody was appointed to the Privy Council .... Like they do it in places like Canada. I thought that you had changed the articles where it was needed.

Again sorry if I upset you

Michael Drew (talk) 05:33, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Percy Shaw Jeffrey

Yes, mea culpa and I believe you are probably right on both points. Certainly, I have nothing with which to dispute your logic; on the first point, I am almost certainly wrong in describing it as "honorary" (though a silly enough mistake to make me wonder why I ever thought it made sense) and secondly, yes, that was the date of his matriculation. Evidently, for some reason, I was trying to find a synonym for matriculation (and failing). Just a bit busy at the moment, I'm sure you know where the edit button it :) - Jarry1250 ^{[Humorous? Discuss.]} 20:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Oxonian2006! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Lawrence Goldman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Robin Attfield - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Brian Davies (philosopher) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David Giles - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nicholas Richardson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Peter L'Estrange - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Mark Elvins - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:22, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Academicals

Richard,

Thank you for writing to me. I only posted a few photos on Wikipedia but this is a small amount compared to my collection. Some of the photos are on the yahoo group photo section but most on on my farcebook page (Charles Rupert Tsua). I did post some on the farcebook group but they were taken down each time for some reason so I just gave up. The photo on my wikipage is a gown I had specially made by S&W, an officers' gown of the Xi Kang Qin Society which I am Registrar of. LittMus: I actually forgot what that is! It is a made up thingy sometime ago of which I forgot about.

Regards,

--Charlie Huang 【遯卋山人】 14:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Young doctors

I finally found the 19 year old Edinburgh doctor: John William Polidori. Rich Farmbrough, 10:45, 25 April 2010 (UTC).[reply]

RICH FARMBROUGH

This proves that you have been working overtime behind the scene with Oxonian 2006.

You could have done a better job by going back few centuries to find the youngest doctor in UK.

We are discussing about UK's youngest doctor in modern times and not going back centuries when the education system might have been different.

May be if you work even harder, you may find that there is a five year Indian boy who is acclaimed a surgeon!

Please keep digging!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.5.126.69 (talk) 08:25, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 11:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Llŷr Williams

Hi, I'm sorry that I'm over five and a half years late in responding to you. Here's the pronunciation for Llŷr: Welsh: [ˈɬɨːr]. Best regards! AdamSommerton (talk) 14:33, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CarolusJosephus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Malcolm Bishop

The article Malcolm Bishop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has had a notability tag for over 4 years. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bondegezou (talk) 18:08, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Oxford Uni dept

Hi @CarolusJosephus, wondered if you could give your wiki thoughts on this draft: Draft:Department of Biology, University of Oxford. I work for the Uni so I have a COI, but the Department was just launched to replace the old departments of Zoology and Plant Sciences, so I have taken content from there and been as objective as possible when creating the page. 48jkb35m (talk) 16:13, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Malcolm Evans (academic lawyer)

The article Malcolm Evans (academic lawyer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to fail WP:NPROF, very few references in reliable published sources outside of academia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:31, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Final Honour School" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Final Honour School has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 15 § Final Honour School until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 17:54, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]