User talk:Carloswiki123

AfC notification: Draft:Pilar Victoria has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pilar Victoria. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pilar Victoria (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pilar Victoria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Carloswiki123, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosamaria Montibeller has been accepted

Rosamaria Montibeller, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 19:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bold

Do not use <b> for bold. Please use wikicode: ''' Bgwhite (talk) 08:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bgwhite: Ok, will do, thank you.

I've already asked once. Please use wikicode. Also, you need to sign your messages by using ~~~~. Bgwhite (talk) 07:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bgwhite Ok, got it. The updates I made yesterday were done with a script, I forgot to change the <b> to ''' in some of the files.Carloswiki123 (talk) 10:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus reached

Dear Carloswiki123, in WikiProject Volleyball, we have reached a consesus over your recent edits. We would like you to please come by have a saying about this WP:UNDUE. Thank you, --Osplace 20:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pilar Victoria

Hello, Carloswiki123. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Pilar Victoria".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:16, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Carloswiki123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]