User talk:Carl Daniels

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! —User:ACupOfCoffee @ 07:20, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Klingon Empire

You changed Klingon Empire to redirect to the game, but the incoming links are mainly intended for the Klingons, so I have put it back. If you want to challenge that, I suggest you start a discussion at Talk:Klingon. - Fayenatic (talk) 13:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Japanese language

Hi Carl Daniels! I saw your message. To tell the truth, it was a difficult decision to revert. But I thought it is not appropriate to add 'modified' in the intro because not all the kanjis are modified. How about the word 日本語? Is there any modified kanji used in it? I think the description here is an appropriate one. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 13:53, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Caspian blue / Appletrees up to her usual tricks

(Redacted)

Thanks, Lucyintheskywithdada. I have my own opinion. I follow it. I wouldn't be involved in the trouble relating to Korean users. though, I seem to be involved by Caspian blue's action on my page. I may move it on, if need.

I have redacted Lucyintheskywithdada's comments. The editor is indef blocked for sockpuppetry and disruption, of which the redacted screed is part. You have read the content, and it is still available for reference in this pages history. While there is considerable lattitude in what account holders may have in "their" (there is no ownership, it is a courtesy extended by Wikipedia as is the privilege of editing) userpages, hosting personal attacks on another editor is not permitted. To clarify, I have removed the content under my authority as an administrator - and if you wish to contest my action I suggest you take your case to WP:AN/Lucyintheskywithdada - and I strongly suggest that you do not bring it back. LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:19, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was removed per WP:Userpage#What you cannot post/point 9. I see you are now harassing Caspian blue, and am now warning you to desist immediately or be sanctioned. LessHeard vanU (talk) 16:11, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know you are an administrator. So I should ask you. I have been doubted by Caspian blue as you know. (1) Do I have NO right to ask him why? and... Caspian blue is not an administrator, but a person, related to that deleted information. (2)Does he have right to erase it on his own will? what do you think fair treatment is as an administrator? (3) what was the harrasment of my actions? --Carl Daniels (talk) 16:50, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind me putting my ore in here but I'd like to answer your questions. Yes of course you have a right to ask her why but an indefblocked user does not. So don't revert that removal. Does Caspian blue have a right to erase it. It's a difficult one. I've already commented on ANI that it would have been better had someone else done it. The harassment OTOH is easier, this isn't on. Hope this helps. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 19:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:BAN#Enforcement_by_reverting_edits

(Redacted) Removed to try and keep some semblance of civility. LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:19, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Yuan.C.Lee

This would be an answer for you. Checkuser said you're likely a sock of indef. blocked Yuan.C.Lee (talk · contribs). If you want to blame someone, well, who would be? --Caspian blue (talk) 15:42, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me

Hello! Carl, you seems Korean reader.

I'm troubled with one person about Woo Jang-choon. There is my point of view report,Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive487#User: Caspian blue. And there is the person's message for me [1] Then he also told WikiProject Japan's people like that I already provided him links that back up the mistreatment that Dr.Woo suffered and Bukubku ignored the "fact".[2]this link. However, I don't think his new source says Japanese mistreated Woo. Moreover I think his source supports my opinion(1.Woo's father is one of assasins 2.Japanese is not Racist), and denys his opinion(1.Japanese government attempted to divert the blame to the Koreans about the assassination of Empress Myeongseong 2.Japanese is Racist). I have already involved and bothered many Admins and WikiProject Japan's member about this problem. However no one read Korean. I don't want to involve you. Carl, you are Korean reader, please translate the person's source. Please help me.--Bukubku (talk) 05:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Bukubku. :) Yes, I will help you.

1 Woo's father is one of assains. Is there any evidences in this link?

No. He is not a person who killed Empress Myeongseong, though He supported the assassination. so You can say Yes.

우장춘의 아버지 우범선은 명성 황후가 시해되던 당시 별기군 훈련 제2대대장이었습니다. 그는 일본군 수비대와 함께 궁궐에 침입, 명성 황후의 시해를 방조했습니다.

(tr.)Woo Jang-choon's father Woo Beom-seon was the 2nd battallion commander of the Special technique discipline at the time of Empress Myeongseong's assasination. He(Woo Jang-choon) entered the Palace with Japanese army garrison, and supported Myeongseong's assassination.

1902년 아버지가 자객에게 암살 당함. (the story tells the assassin is Ko Yong-gun)

(tr.) In 1902, father(Woo Beom-seon) is assassinated (by Ko Yong-gun(고영근)).

So, I conclude, He was a person who suppported the assassination of Empress Myeongseong, and was assassinated by Ko Yong-gun(고영근).

2 Japanese is racist. - Is there any evidences in this link?

No. In this story, Japanese are His mother, and his colleague.

I can't find any racism of them.

I suppose Caspian blue is trying to mislead his mother's word:

“너는 조선인이다. 성은 우씨이고 이름은 장춘이다.”

(tr.)"You are Korean(조선인). your family name is Woo, the last is Jang-choon."

I know well that Koreans take the word, 조선인 as a derogatory term. though, that sentence is followed by ...

어머니는 어린 우장춘이 항상 조선인임을 잊지 않도록 성심껏 가르쳤습니다

(tr.)Mother taught him that he was a Korean(조선인), with her heart.

so, it's not the evidence of Japanese racism.

3 Japanese government attemptted to divert the blame to the Koreans about the assassination of Empress Myeongseong - Is there any evidences in this link?

Absolutely, No. it doesn't tell Japanese attempt as Caspian blue says.

--Carl Daniels (talk) 23:12, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bukbku, shame one you. You're lying about my comment. I said generally the article is referenced by a Korean book" and links and I do not specify the content that you blanked as falsely labeling "racist" and only forged that I only mentioned about the one link. Tell me where are "racism" contents I inserted to the article? People at WP:JA pointed out on your false labeling and then visited him, Carl Daniels? It is so familiar attempt. Carl Daniels, I think it is a time for something. Good luck.--Caspian blue 23:31, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Carl.

I'm sorry, I posted a report before you translated.(Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive489#User: Caspian blue (second)) Your translation is better than mine. Now the issue is mooted in Mediation Cabal, so your translation as a third person is very helpful.

Thank you.--Bukubku (talk) 03:09, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carl, I mixed yours and my translations. and I wrote like this[3]. If you find my mistakes, please teach me. Thank you very much, I appreciate to you.--Bukubku (talk) 08:04, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

m(_ _)m

Now I and Xavexgoem (talk · contribs) are talking with one person in Talk:Woo Jang-choon#medcab. The person provide massive Korean contents. We are not native. You are a Korean reader. Would you mind getting in our talk as a third person for improving article.--Bukubku (talk) 17:41, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Carl Daniels! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Sin Gwang-su (spy) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 寺院

The article 寺院 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DICDEF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rob Sinden (talk) 07:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

庭球 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 庭球. Since you had some involvement with the 庭球 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The ChampionMan 1234 09:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

籠球 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 籠球. Since you had some involvement with the 籠球 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The ChampionMan 1234 06:17, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Carl Daniels. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Carl Daniels~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

22:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

サッカー listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect サッカー. Since you had some involvement with the サッカー redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:17, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Carl Daniels. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

拳闘 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 拳闘. Since you had some involvement with the 拳闘 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 19:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]