User talk:Carillonnl

Hi Carillonnl and thanks for your recent edits to the article Nieuwe Toren, Kampen!. You added the category "Museums in the Netherlands" so I was wondering in what capacity this tower is a museum? Is it open year-round, and could you add a link to a website with more information? Thanks, Jane (talk) 14:07, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This link about museum was not made by me. The Nieuwe Toren is not a museum so there is no link. Close by is the city museum in Kampen. I think you can delete the link Carillonnl (talk) 20:22, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks! Jane (talk) 20:27, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

made some new edits in the English version of the Carillon. Most of it is taken from my Dutch work on same. (partly translated and made better. I also made a link to the page of Nieuwe Toren Kampen what I also translated from the Dutch site Carillonnl (talk) 07:42, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks for your work. If there is any other bell tower you are interested in, let me know if I can help you set up an article. Jane (talk) 19:14, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks. I can do but problem is my technical English is not so good. For this articel I asked mr. [John Gouwens] one of America's best carillonplayers at Culvery to do a check. Carillonnl (talk) 07:44, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

well I am very glad you did! I enjoyed reading the article. Jane (talk) 08:53, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I made some new edits with the book in my hand. I also redesigned a little ; more logic. Carillonnl (talk) 10:09, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zuiderzee Museum

Hi again! I see that I have already thanked you for other work you did, but now I just wanted to thank you for your recent edits to the article on the Zuiderzee Museum. When I visited the museum I had no idea that there were so few pictures on Commons. I was just cleaning up the photos on Commons and noticed some of them were used in this article which you have done lots of good work on. The article of course needs even more work: maybe to be split into the Binnenmuseum and the Buitenmuseum, or there should at least be articles for the various large buildings (such as the church?) that were moved to the Buitenmuseum. I think there could be articles as well for some of the ships in the Binnenmuseum and the harbour. ...and biographical articles for the people who lived and worked in the Peperhuis in the 17th-century, and... Jane (talk) 09:56, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Carillonnl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Carillonnl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Willem van Twillert

The article Willem van Twillert has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:37, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Willem van Twillert moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Willem van Twillert, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. In addition, the article needs another in-depth source or two to pass WP:GNG. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Willem van Twillert

Hello, Carillonnl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Willem van Twillert, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]