User talk:Capricorn42/Archive5

(no title)

i dont like u all ready F aidan (talk) 07:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

F*** you bro — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.109.28.148 (talk • contribs)

Why do you keep removing my posts. Are you my stalker. are you the rpaists who raped me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulrobertscool (talk • contribs)

thanks

That clears it up, I thought it was wierd! Wikisaver62 (talk) 16:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thx

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. Happy hunting, ~~SIS~~ 16:35, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Error

Oh yes, sorry. I noticed, I clicked speedy delete his talk page by accident once. I did however, revert it straight away. Thanks for the lookout! Cheers Lunchscale ^Talk! ^Contrib! 16:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Watchlist

We seem to have similar watchlists. You've beat me to reversions on both Child labor and George Washington Carver now. :) ^S._D.D.J.Jameson 17:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no I don't have these pages in my watchlist. I saw the vandalism in recent changes IRC feed.:) --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 17:38, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so you're an RC patroller. One way or the other, you're quicker on the draw than I am! ^S._D.D.J.Jameson 17:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very disappointed!

You didn't tell User:Contempo1254 to "piss off". Thanks for the great vandalism-cleanup work you do! DMacks (talk) 03:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EDITING.

Why, oh why, do you have to mess with me? All of my editing has been purposeful so please leave me alone when I do these useful edits. Wikinator 95 (talk)

I AM THE EGG.

EDITING 2

Again you follow me around trying to stop my edits. Why, Why, Why do you do this. Stop it now...or I will report you to the higher authorities.EggOne (talk)

I AM THE EGG.

Fast :)

Damn, you're fast. Beating me to the vandals most of the time. :) Time for me to clock out and take a break, anyway. Keep fighting the good fight! --Gravecat (talk) 15:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, have a good day :) --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 15:52, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey you...

...won't you like to become a sysop? I think the tools would be a great help for fighting vandalism! I would like to nominate you! abf /talk to me/ 17:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but its not been a month, although I've been an IP editor for around 6 months. It helps to have extra tools but right now I'm not ready, if you see my contribs I'm a "HuggleBot" with no article creation/expansion and little contribution in AfD's. So I'll try later, maybe an year or so.Thanks for the message, Cheers! --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 17:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Freeland, PA

You are really, really gay for reverting my good edit to Freeland, PA. Stupid liberals! 204.186.77.109 (talk) 19:49, 18 November 2008 (UTC) tilde tilde tilde tilde[reply]

im sorry about that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.62.194.85 (talk) 01:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Dude

I didn't do it. My sis edited while i wasn't looking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.191.242.210 (talk • contribs)

Reverting multiple edit

Just a reminder when reverting vandalism to check the history so as not to "protect" previous vandalism by only reverting the most recent. I know how easy it is to just catch the last one as I have found myself doing that far too often. I reverted the previous vandalism by User:70.120.172.124 which you at revert back to see diff-1 and diff-2. Thanks for your ongoing work in trying to keep Wikipedia free from vandalism. PS I like your edit page heading reminder to sign posts Dbiel ^(Talk) 04:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll be more careful. :) --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 04:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template vandalism

Thanks for clearing up the rest. I'll evaluate them for protection. --GraemeL ^(talk) 15:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes no problem. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 15:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lutheran South Academy Vandalism

I am a member of the faculty at Lutheran South Academy. You seem to be part of the problem or the solution, I am not sure which. Are you fixing the vandalism or causing it? Please verify the action, we are taking legal action. Please assist us with this problem if you can. Thank you.

Luxurywyatt (talk) 19:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for the countless times you have defeated me in getting to vandalism. Goodjob! --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 20:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

back!?

back to your old tricks, EH!?

..:)

12.47.19.99 (talk) 12:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was broken

I removed a broken link! I clicked on it, and it said 404 not found!! --IForgotToEatBreakFast (talk) 13:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You also removed article's categories. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 13:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

spamming

Hi,

I am adding official URL's to various artist webpages and yet I am being wrongly accused of spamming. How do I change this?

Adam Heayberd (talk) 13:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Adam HeayberdAdam Heayberd (talk) 13:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated. I fully understand that it may look dodgy, however I am doing this as a request by the management team which represents the artists covered by the iViva website. Thank you.

Adam Heayberd (talk) 13:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Adam HeayberdAdam Heayberd (talk) 13:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how it's legit. Just claiming (or, rather, putting official at the beginning of the URL) doesn't mean it's the gospel official website of the celebrity. - Dudesleeper / Talk 15:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These artists are managed by ********* management and the pages I have listed are fully endorsed and set up by the management group. Please do your research.

Adam Heayberd (talk) 15:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Adam Heayberd[reply]

How about waiting until the celebrities' websites are actually fully created (if they actually will be)? At this point, it just looks like you're promoting Iviva. - Dudesleeper / Talk 15:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well yes, I visited the website and it says its official but there is no way that I know of to confirm this. The user adding links is probably editing in good faith so instead of reverting his edits as spam I thought I should leave the issue there and get back to my work (reverting blatant vandalism). I don't have any knowledge about celebrity stuff, so I think it would be better to take this issue to talk page of the articles or Talk:Wikiproject Celebrities (if that exists) and let the knowledeable people decide whether the links stay or go. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 15:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to sign

Template:Vandalism_information You sorta forgot to sign your update =) --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 13:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, thanks; and looks like it needs to be updated too. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 14:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just being a bit picky

Thanks for all your work reverting vandalism. One request, please only use the Template:uw-huggle4im (looks like this hidden tag is also invalid) on pages that it is the only vandalism warning post. Use Template:uw-huggle4 instead for a final warning. See diff. Note this might simply be a minor error in your huggle setup that could be easily fixed. Thank you again for your on going work fighting vandalism. Dbiel ^(Talk) 15:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes thanks I'm looking into it. Maybe its just one time that i clicked the warn button and issued 4im. I'll see if that happens again and try to fix it. Thanks--Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 15:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work. I am suprised at how often you name pops up on my watch list. Dbiel ^(Talk) 01:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One Team, One Dream

I'm not vandalizing, I'm removing. Please stop reversing it. Cbmanning19 (talk) 15:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have a strange definition of removing vandalism diff In my book, major deletions without an edit summary and additions of "I'll save ya some trouble. Delete at will." is vandalism. I fully support the revert by User:Unpopular Opinion Dbiel ^(Talk) 15:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dana White

Can you check that again please? http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Dana_White&action=history DOUBLEBLUE (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mbella Sonne Dipoko

You (pretty rapidly) put my article up for instant deletion. I do not intend to see it deleted. Could you please tell me if it is still eligible for speedy deletion, or if I need to do some more work on it? Please don't delete it until I can work on it... That would be much appreciated. Thank you, --Fuzzibloke (talk) 21:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, no problem. I wondered why I got no big sign at the top. Admittedly, the criticism was accurate, but I think I've now done something about it. I remain impressed at the sheer speed with which you put that up/responded. Fuzzibloke (talk) 21:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour!

Well, i dont know how to write in that format. I basically copy someone elses sig, and reformat everything. The size, color, font, border, etc. And keep testing till i like it. Lol, and that diff was hillarious. M.H.^{ITrue Romace iS Dead} 21:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought wiki crashed when i saw this. But it was Grawp. Simply can be done by posting multiple big tags on pages. M.H.^{ITrue Romace iS Dead} 21:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want a sig, i can make one for you. M.H.^{ITrue Romace iS Dead} 21:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I think I'll look into the help pages. I like simple signatures but some signatures here are kinda cool.--Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 03:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...

... for cleaning the vandalism to my User page. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 05:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 05:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the Schedule page. I didn't realise it was published. It won't happen again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.111.191.62 (talk) 12:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]