User talk:Capogeezy5

Capo Geezy

Please stop adding random name-drops to this person. Instead, write a reliably sourced article in this person which makes a credible claim of notability. If they're not notable enough for a separate article, they don't need to be in Wikipedia. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:10, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How can I do that? Capogeezy5 (talk) 03:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pick an article name like Capo Geezy and write your article there. That way it doesn't overwrite an existing article on some other person. Note that you will need to include some reliable sources on why this person is notable enough to have a Wikipedia page. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can see the draft you've created, thanks for this. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome brother. Please approve as soon as possible. My client & his label wanted to keep it as short as possible will send you more information, to approve. Capogeezy5 (talk) 03:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with Capo. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:1118:6445:1C7F:E9FF:FEBF:D65C (talk) 03:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]