User talk:Cap
More information needed about File:Nuneaton.jpg
[edit]Hello, Cap!
It was really helpful of you to upload File:Nuneaton.jpg, but in order to keep new images, we need to know their exact source and copyright status.
If you can edit the description page and add that information, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.
Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Nuneaton town centre photograph enquiries
[edit]Hi Cap, I am writing in relation of the image of the Nuneaton town centre which has been used on the following page (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Nuneaton). We are going to use it for the exhibition entitled 'What's history in Nuneaton? Young people's reflections on the town's past, present and future'. The exhibition is the result of a project 'Community memory and young people's civic activism: Mining communities of West Midlands in times of socio-economic transformations, the 1950s, the 1970s-80s, 2008-12' run in partnership by the University of Warwick (Department of Sociology) and the Herbert Art Gallery and Museum. For the exhibition purposes we asked young people to produce photographic works using their photos taken by themselves or archival images. In the case of the Nuneaton town centre image the young person used it to represent the changes in the town: He used Photoshop to merge that image with another one taken in the beginning of the 20th century. This image will be used for the slide show which will be part of the exhibition. The initial idea was to print out the photographic work containing the image on the large size panel or pull-up display stand for the exhibition. But unfortunately the resolution of the image available is too low for this. Therefore, I would like ask you whether it is possible to provide this photo in higher resolution (perhaps as a jpeg file). It would help us to continue with the initial plan for exhibition. We will follow all copyright requirements and acknowledge your contribution to the exhibition. Thank you in advance for your help.Please email me ussing the email address below. Kind regards, Anton Popov a.popov@warwick.ac.uk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.221.209 (talk) 09:38, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
British Civil Wars listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect British Civil Wars. Since you had some involvement with the British Civil Wars redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 16:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
The British Civil Wars listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The British Civil Wars. Since you had some involvement with the The British Civil Wars redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 16:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Midlands Today
[edit]Hello Cap, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Midlands Today, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midlands Today.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)