User talk:Cao Ren
Welcome!
[edit]
|
References please
[edit]Thank you for your contributions regarding the military history of China. But please provide references for the material you are adding, as Wikipedia requires that all material be verifiable. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Charles Christiaan, Prince of Nassau.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Charles Christiaan, Prince of Nassau.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Phillipe de Rullecort.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Phillipe de Rullecort.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:John Burroughs Hopkins.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:John Burroughs Hopkins.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Accuracy
[edit]Battle of Viminacium This was completely wrong.--Ben Ben (talk) 19:33, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
German vs. Germanic peoples
[edit]Please stop editing history articles untill you understand the historical difference between Germans and Germanic peoples!--Ben Ben (talk)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Campaignbox Byzantine-German Wars
[edit]
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:Campaignbox Byzantine-German Wars, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ben Ben (talk) 19:41, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
November 2011
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Siege of Rome (537–538), you may be blocked from editing. Ben Ben (talk) 19:44, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Byzantine-Germanic Wars
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Byzantine-Germanic Wars. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Vandalic War, Gothic War (535–554), Eurasian Avars. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Vandalic War, Gothic War (535–554), Eurasian Avars - you might like to discuss new information at Talk:Vandalic War, Talk:Gothic War (535–554), the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Ben Ben (talk) 20:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Ustad Ali Quli. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please provide sources when you create articles. Eeekster (talk) 02:03, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sagar Singh
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sagar Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. M Magister Scientatalk (20 November 2011) 05:12, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Furstenburg
[edit]Hello Cao Ren, I see you're creating some articles on this German noble house. However there are some problems with that. First of all, rootsweb is not a reliable source which can be seen in the second problem, naming. There is no House Fürstenburg or Furstenburg for that matter. THe correct name e.g. is Egon of Fürstenberg-Hechingen (note -berg, not -burg), compare de:Egon VIII. (Fürstenberg-Heiligenberg). So please wait with creating any more such stubs and consider using reliable references. De728631 (talk) 15:36, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- And please don't use machine translations, they are mostly wrong and they always require vast amounts of cleanup. Please see WP:Translation for how to request translations of articles from other Wikipedias. De728631 (talk) 16:02, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Adina Beg has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 20:24, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I tagged for BLP by mistake - the tag has been removed from the page and the page tagged for cleanup. Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 20:28, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Can you expand the reference information? Publisher, date, page number, full author's name. Also, the article lead is insufficient, it should explain what makes him notable. Wasn't he a general? Thanks! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 23:28, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Phillipe de Rullecort.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Phillipe de Rullecort.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:16, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Friedrich Ludwig Albrecht von Eyb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Appears to fail WP:GNG. Only mentioned in passing in various sources....
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sailsbystars (talk) 19:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Joachim of Furstenburg for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joachim of Furstenburg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joachim of Furstenburg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Night of the Big Wind talk 14:44, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Anna Maria of Hohenzollern-Hechingen for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna Maria of Hohenzollern-Hechingen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Maria of Hohenzollern-Hechingen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Night of the Big Wind talk 14:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Frederick IV of Fürstenberg for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frederick IV of Fürstenberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick IV of Fürstenberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ben Ben (talk) 17:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Interwiki links
[edit]It might help to make the correct type of links to the articles in other Wikipedias:
Do no enter it as an external reference, but in the special format , e.g. {{fr:French name of article}} where fr"or whatever (it , es , de , etc. ) is the two letter code for the language, and the name is the name of the article in that wiki. It is not actually necessary to enter the reciprocal link in the other wiki, because there's a program that does it, but if you do, enter it as {{en:English name of article}}
In either case, it goes in the bottom. usually after the references. DGG ( talk ) 05:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
The article Sagar Singh has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:30, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Qaplan II Giray.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Qaplan II Giray.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 07:24, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Files missing description details
[edit]
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:26, 14 April 2013 (UTC)First Oirat- Manchu War sources
[edit]I noticed that you had created the article Battle of Jao Modo and wondered if you knew of further sources/ information on these topics. I'm trying to expand articles related to this topic.Rwenonah (talk) 20:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Mir Shakti Singh
[edit]The article Mir Shakti Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Tagged for notability since 2011, and no indication thereof; even if notability can be shown, the article has a history consisting wholly of unencyclopedic content that WP:TNT can apply
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mz7 (talk) 18:25, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Rana Jai Singh
[edit]The article Rana Jai Singh has been proposed for deletion for the following concern:
- No references or external links or any source denoting that this person was of any importance. See WP:GNG.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hagoromo's Susanoo (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Rana Jai Singh for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rana Jai Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana Jai Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 11:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Friedrich Von Schomberg.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
The article Mir Mohib Ali Khalifa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No WP:SOURCES found
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Mughal-Rajput War
[edit]
Template:Campaignbox Mughal-Rajput War has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 13:10, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Mughal–Rajput wars for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mughal–Rajput wars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.