User talk:Cantara/Bibliography

Great idea! Would we basically overhaul the "Sources" of sections? And what type of style would we use? APA, MLA, or Chicago? --MPD01605 01:12, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I personally like MLA, just because it's what makes the most sense to me, but I'm not totally sold on it, so bring on the input. There really should be a subst:citation template to make this easier, no matter what we decide...has someone already made one? Cantara 01:22, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's this all about?

I popped in here because this project template appeard on Talk:The Beatles just now... Do you have some articles that you think are well done? It's certainly something that could be added to the task list of WP:BEATLES for folks to look at when working on articles. But howto's or examples will help a lot. ++Lar: t/c 00:48, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was really impressed by the list of sources at Meister Eckhart: that's partly what inspired me to start this project. "Hey, wow! All articles should look like this!" Apparently the template was taken off of the Beatles page, which is fair given Kingboyk's argument (that all articles have sources, why make a fuss?), but at least a few people saw it. On my list of things to do is to make a lists like the ones you suggested, as well as more detailed project instructions, but I thought getting the word out wouldn't hurt. The project's point is as much about getting users to change the way they think about sources as anything else. And thanks for your interest! Spread the word, lend a hand, if you like. Cantara 01:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Bibliography

You may be interested to know that WikiProject Bibliography has just been created. RockMagnetist (talk) 02:55, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]