User talk:Canhelp

Upload Discussion - September 2011

I am claiming applicability of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 to license today's upload of file G_semantics1946model.pdf. This view is supported in the upload summary, with more substantiation on the talk page for the file. Canhelp (talk) 20:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A .png version of the file uploaded on 18 September 2011 is now replacing the .pdf file in the article General_semantics. Canhelp (talk) 21:23, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:G semantics1946model.png

Thank you for uploading File:G semantics1946model.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 23:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My deletion from General Semantics

Aha! I finally parsed that sentence. It read, you'll recall,

Yet another characterization for general semantics, indifferent to all university standards and limitations, considers general semantics a "discipline."

It is, at best, awkwardly worded. The placement of the phrase "indifferent to all university standards and limitations" gave me fits trying to decipher the sentence. But feel free to put (a hopefully rewritten) sentence to that effect back in. Phiwum (talk) 04:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.

Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis [1][2], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=41493446 (HTTPS).

Best Regards, Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 09:08, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.

File:G semantics1946model.pdf listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:G semantics1946model.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:55, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:G semantics1946model.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:G semantics1946model.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:56, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Research Participation Barnstar
		For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 13:37, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Outsider (2005 film) (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Outsider (2005 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Outsider (2005 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 19:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Canhelp! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 19:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Outsider (2005 film) has been accepted

The Outsider (2005 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:37, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, GeoffreyT2000. And thank you for your time and expertise, both of which are needed to sustain and strengthen Wikipedia. Canhelp (talk) 04:06, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Invasive species, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prickly pear. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Literature and Science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eyeless in Gaza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Toback, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page When Will I Be Loved.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Odd edit

Can you explain why you did this? https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=James_Toback&diff=1127858088&oldid=1127096109 I've never encountered an edit like it. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The default algorithms that were active in Wikipedia software were prompting related articles either marginally or not at all related to Toback. Canhelp (talk) 16:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm not familiar with this method or with best practices. Can you maybe point me to some documentation for how to do this and how to do it well? I'll reinsert this if the algorithms are still the same (are they?), as it looks like you've got a good reason for including it and I just didn't understand. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just glanced at what currently displays as James Toback "related articles." I believe this is the same display or at least is a closely similar display to what I updated with my manual change. I believe the documentation I used to make the change is the documentation viewable at: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:RelatedArticles#Usage Canhelp (talk) 17:42, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neat. Thanks for educating me. Seems like we should have some local documentation on how to use it (where to place it in a page, maximum amounts, etc.) ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Invasive species

Invasive species has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt. I had not looked at the article recently. I'm now seeing your significant edit in recent history. This coming weekend, I'll spend time reading and thinking and then will comment to the reassessment page. Canhelp (talk) 02:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]