User talk:Cangorongo

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Cangorongo! I am SatuSuro and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Satu Suro 00:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lies

Hey good start - lots of editing to do - you need to be very careful - some buzzards may come and pick the article apart to about a 10th of the size due to unencyclopediac tone/style/content - wikipedia is not a blog - most of what you have there is better on a blog. Also - categories are not done like that - watch what i do for that! look in the edit mode and reverse engineer. Dont get downhearted if someone blasts your work out of the water - try again - cheers Satu Suro 00:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} to SatuSuro - thanks for your help. I am aware that this text is too long and anecdotal - it's ok if someone shortens it down to the relevant info - it's the text I wrote for the Lies website (I was one of the editors). The question is - I've done the article, but I'm having trouble getting links to on menu/index pages. For instance, when I put it in Magazines-Australian-defunkt - it didn't give me the option of putting in its alphabetical place, the new link to it is at the top of the page, which isn't correct, and I'm hoping you or someone will correct that.Cangorongo (talk) 01:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just pplaced the defunct magazine category at the base of the article - check that Satu Suro 01:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Hi SatuSuro again. Thanks for that - but why is the option to edit that index not visible, and is it acceptable to just place an entry and wait for someone who's able to sort it out? And another one regarding Lies: would it be appropriate to put it into the index page 'Satirical Magazines' - there's several in there which are also defunkt/not current, but anyway, the paper magazine is defunkt but the website is there with free pages, some new editions and plans to put up some of my recent satirical work. If not fair enough I won't make a fuss.Cangorongo (talk) 01:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Categories are added at the bottom of the article, like [[Category:Defunct magazines of Australia]]. For more information, see Help:Categories.--Werdan7^{T @} 01:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} SatuSuro I am off to bed now I'm in the UK it's 2.43am, but I'll get that Lies article into much better shape in the next few days - thanks for your helpCangorongo (talk) 01:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} SatuSuro I've just given the Lies article a thorough going over - it should be more appropriate for wikipedia now. When do the comments boxes at the top get re-appraised? Also - there's no citations or external reference sources for this entry - because there's no other mention of this topic on the web.

Hi there, if that's the case it could be original research which is not allowed on wikipedia. Also, you can remove the comment boxes your self if you feel that they are no longer valid. The Helpful One ^(Review) 15:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Cinema Prague

A tag has been placed on Cinema Prague requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 12:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} I have just placed an article about a fairly well known band - Cinema Prague - and it's immediately received a 'speedy deletion' notice. Looking at the criteria for a speedy deletion, I don't think it deserves it!!Cangorongo (talk) 13:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can establish notability by referencing the article with reliable sources. You might want to check Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musical acts to make sure this band satisfies them. Best, Gr1st (talk) 14:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted talk from Talk:Cinema Prague

I have place this new entry for Cinema Prague. It is little more than a stub, I agree.

I can't see what the problem is - it is a well known and well respected band with a long history and four albums. The article is not thorough, but it is basically a stub.

How can I indicate the 'importance' of this band, without using language which is opinionated and unbiased?

I think 'speedy deletion' is not appropriate for a posting done in good faith about a topic which has a legitimate right to be there.Cangorongo (talk) 13:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It may be in good faith, but it still completely fails to meet the minimum criteria for inclusion. Notability for a band means that it's important enough to have been reviewed by major publications, etc. See WP:BAND. DMacks (talk) 15:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Parked at User:Cangorongo/Cinema Prague for a little while. DMacks (talk) 01:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lies Magazine

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lies Magazine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cinema Prague

Am currently working on a draft article for Cinema Prague and when I did a quick search found you had already created (& had deleted) an article on the band. I intended to expand and fully reference the article before I post it - have found that if you can justify the article in the article it avoids having it deleted. As you can see I have taken some of your words in my 1st draft and am more than happy if you want to add anything before I post it. Dan arndt (talk) 00:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have done some further updates to Cinema Prague but have struggled to find verifiable third party references - have cobbled together a lot of the information for various sources. If you know of any info regarding the band's early history (i.e. original members, original name etc) then feel free to add it to the draft. The lead sentence needs to be sourced (have used your words) as it reads like an opinion. Also I am guessing that all the band's releases were independent recordings as I have been unable to find any label details. Also if you come across any reviews/interviews verifying their international performances that would assist. Dan arndt (talk) 03:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:On-the-verge.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:On-the-verge.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]