User talk:Canadianfixerupper

Welcome!

Hello, Canadianfixerupper! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 20:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Canadianfixerupper, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 20:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla dispute

Hey there, I invite you to join the discussion here.

Drever

I really don't want to edit war, so I hope you'll come to the article talk page to discuss the info in the thread I've initiated. Connormah (talk) 00:58, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The information is all fact the image wasn't me, but I am going to add referenced articles about this situation since this is a big swing, she beat a potential cabniet member.

New Democratic Party

Hello, we have asked you repeatedly to take your dispute with the political position of the New Democratic Party to the talk page before making changes to the infobox. Disputes such as this one are common on this page and are best handled by reaching a consensus amongst editors on the talk page. If you persist in changing this on the main page rather than participating in the discussion, you may be barred from editing. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 14:19, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please defend your edit at Talk:New Democratic Party. TFD (talk) 15:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Nikola Tesla, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 01:16, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Your recent editing history at Ruth Bader Ginsburg shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 23:59, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Political Parties of Supreme Court Justices

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Associate_Justice_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States#Political_Party_Affiliations_of_Justices To try and find some common ground, I'd like your two cents. 134.129.203.28 (talk) 02:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

→ https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:John_Roberts#Political_Party_Affiliations_of_Federal_Justices Moved here 134.129.203.28 (talk) 03:43, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Canadianfixerupper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]