User talk:CamoBeast

Userfying

Please explain why you have twice userfied list of creatures in Walking with Prehistoric Life and why you have actually removed what little content it had. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:33, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you deleted my subpage? I try to create the list but that form it is uncorrect. First I have to write the list on a subpage and then I'll redirect my subpage to normal page. Please don't delete this subpage! --CamoBeast (talk) 14:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So why create the page by a move? That is the problem. I have created User:CamoBeast/List of creatures in Walking with Prehistoric Life by copy&paste. Enjoy. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:39, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No edits by you of any significance have been deleted. Please learn to read contributions and article histories. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Planet Dinosaur

Why did you destroy the Episode list table in Planet Dinosaur? Barsoomian (talk) 17:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Copying your response back here:)

Your list table for Planet Dinosaur is completely needless. Giving the same informations which are existing in the infobox is nonsense. The list table is only use for normal series like Primeval (and better in separate pages like the List of creatures in Primeval page) and not for miniseries. What have you done is equal to vandalism. Deleting informations from the infobox is vandalism. Undoing the page is not solution. Keep in mind that!!! And don't undo again!!! --CamoBeast (talk) 18:55, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Calling me a vandal is ironic when it was you that destroyed the page formatting. And you are coming close to violating WP:Civility.
It's a list of episodes, therefore it should use Template:Episode list, like the thousands of other TV shows here.
As for "Giving the same informations which are existing in the infobox is nonsense.": See MOS:INFOBOX#Purpose_of_an_infobox "the purpose of an infobox: to summarize key facts about the article". So all the facts in the infobox SHOULD be in the article as well. See the thousands of TV shows that use infoboxes for examples of their use. Barsoomian (talk) 03:02, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

copied back again. Keep the discussion here.

Yeah, but that series are not miniseries. Look at Walking with Dinosaurs, Beasts, Monsters, Cavemen, Dinosaur Planet and the other miniseries which aren't use this table. I can't find any miniseries which use that. If Planet Dinosaur will have a second or third series than we have to use this table. You have no idea what are you doing. I suppose you don't now what is miniseries. You behave like the page would be yours. The list table is a stupid idea and unnecessary. Who cares who is the writer of an episode if all of the episodes have the same writer which is extisting in the infobox. And so on the others. You vandalized the page, because you delete the composer, producer etc. section from the infobox. The page IS NOT yours!!!--CamoBeast (talk) 08:49, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaur series are still TV series. Miniseries are still TV series. They all can and do use the Template:Episode list. And you are continuing to be insulting and uncivil. Barsoomian (talk) 11:34, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now I really hate you. Report me for a block without evidence is a very infamous thing. I'm not that man. I can prove you. I'm Hungarian, nem hiszem, hogy Raptor Red valaha is képes lenne ilyen szöveget írni magyarul. Translate it.--CamoBeast (talk) 18:03, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. –MuZemike 17:38, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CamoBeast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What??? I'm sorry, but I can't understand. This is a mistake. I'm not Raptor Red, check my IP adress. Do you have any evidence for a block? Barsoomian just don't like me because we have differing views. Please check me somehow, because I'm not that guy. I'm registered in 21:33, 7 March 2011. CamoBeast (talk) 18:25, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

CheckUser-confirmed sockpuppet of Raptor Red. —DoRD (talk) 19:06, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is the confirmation? You are don't do anything just saying that I'm Raptor Red. You are without reasons. Your reason is just an idiot's say-so. Thank you Barsoomian! I hope you have a nice day! And one more thing: fuck yourself Raptor Red, I'm blocked because of you and your idiotism.--CamoBeast (talk) 19:41, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"What is the confirmation?" As above: "CheckUser-confirmed sockpuppet of Raptor Red." Barsoomian (talk) 03:09, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a confirmation. This is just a Wikipedia page to how to check a user. That's it. This isn't mean that I'm checked. I want an IP check. For an IP check you have to add me to a list for checking. A check like this can take for days or more. But I'm blocked 20 minutes after your message to the admin. I can also write to you talk page that you are Raptor Red (CheckUser-confirmed sockpuppet of Raptor Red.), I can do that all the time I want. I don't blame you, I much more blame that irresponsible admin. Many thanks! How to be an ecyclopedia like this is so badly structured? How to be an admin is so credolous. I don't believe it. What do you want? To admit that I'm Raptor Red? Sorry, I can't, BECAUSE I'M NOT RAPTOR RED

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CamoBeast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Barsoomian's statement is completely nonsense and incorrect. I'm registered in 21:33, 7 March 2011 and I made my first edit in that day, so Barsoomian's statement (that I'm made my first edit in April 4, two days after Raptor Red is blocked) is incorrect. And yes, I'm an experienced editor, because I was a user of the Hungarian wiki with my old account. I WANT AN IP CHECK! CamoBeast (talk) 18:25, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"CheckUser confirmed" means that someone with the technical tools (checking IP address, OS, Browser version, etc) confirmed a match. The technical check was done - they do not paste that information on the page for provacy reasons. Want to claim "irresponsible admin more", I'll be happy to remove your access to this talkpage (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, it's not done, because I'm still blocked. I want a real IP check (because this checking is false or simply not done). WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE ABOUT MY CHECK? Wikipedia is wrong. Doing this is nonsense. Well, I don't care, then I'll create another account. I just wanted to behave honestly, but looks like here this isn't matter. I'll stop writing here when you check my IP adress.---145.236.23.246 (talk) 13:49, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CamoBeast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now I find the reason why is my block isn't confirmed and the check isn't done. If I would checked I would have to be in this page. But I can't find myself in the page. I'm sure now that here are many not serious administrators. That admin just blocked me, because Barsoomian's said, that's it. That admin is clearly irresponsible.--145.236.23.246 (talk) 14:35, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As Bwilkins promised, your talk page access has been revoked. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:50, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.