User talk:Camdoodlebop

Welcome!

Hello, Camdoodlebop, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Safiel (talk) 03:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Challenor editing her own article

Hello I'm digging on potential COI regarding this person's article, could you point me to instances of her editing her own article and linking to it? Thanks! --Loganmac (talk) 04:19, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hi Camdoodlebop! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Artificial intelligence art several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Artificial intelligence art, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bad faith accusations

Please take a look at WP:AOBF before casually accusing any more editors of acting in bad faith, as you did in recent reverts at [1] and [2].

Other editors removing your images from articles might be frustrating, but does not mean that they are vandalising Wikipedia and acting in bad faith. Both I and Artem.G gave clear reasons for the removals from Text-to-image model and Thumb signal. Explaining on the article talk page why you think your image belongs in the article would reflect better on you, and be more in keeping with WP:ONUS ("The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content.") Lord Belbury (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is my final notice that the two of you stop harassing me and my contributions. Any further stalking, inappropriate behavior, and bad faith activity will be escalated as I do not accept it. Whether these two accounts are even the same person or not is not entirely important, it's clear that this bully behavior is a common trend for you. Do not bother me any more. Camdoodlebop (talk) 20:41, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of your frustrations, personal attacks are not acceptable. If you post anything along the lines of this again, you will be blocked from editing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:56, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, edit warring to restore your own disputed and redundant images to articles claiming vandalism, which it is not, needs to stop.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]