User talk:Calmsurble

Welcome!

Hello, Calmsurble, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marcus Bell Calmsurble

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marcus Bell Calmsurble, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 20:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Maliner (talk) 03:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No this is not autobiography. This is a serious matter though thank you. Calmsurble (talk) 03:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. Onorem (talk) 04:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Marcus Owen Bell (Calmsurble). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Untamed1910 (talk) 04:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are vandalizing and lying about historical information directly from the House of Delegates if you do not stop you will have trouble with the government. Calmsurble (talk) 04:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Clearly you are edit warring on Marcus Owen Bell (Calmsurble), constantly reverting things you don't like. That's against Wikipedia edit war rules. I worry that you have already broken the three-revert rule, and I certainly do not want to do so. Please desist. Otherwise I will report you with a recommendation that you are blocked. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are vandalizing this article please stop. There is notable factual information ordained by the House of Delegates and the Kennedy Center. Calmsurble (talk) 04:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR clearly states that An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule often attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Fourth reverts just outside the 24-hour period will usually also be considered edit-warring, especially if repeated or combined with other edit-warring behavior. Untamed1910 (talk) 05:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Calmsurble reported by User:Untamed1910 (Result: ). Thank you. Untamed1910 (talk) 05:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Untamed1910 is Vandalizing an article with information verified from the House of Delegates Calmsurble (talk) 05:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is BS. Untamed1910 (talk) 05:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is real information https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?091+ful+HJ750ER Calmsurble (talk) 05:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is an unreliable source. Untamed1910 (talk) 05:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Im sorry fellow user but this a official goverment document. Take it up with the FBI and The CIA and the House of Delegates. Calmsurble (talk) 05:18, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:RS all articles including Marcus Owen Bell (Calmsurble) must have reliable sources. Failure to follow Wikipedia's policys may get you blocked from editing. Untamed1910 (talk) 05:34, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are saying information from the House of Delegates is not real information? Please take some time offline to think about what you are typing. Calmsurble (talk) 05:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, Read WP:RS, Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

This guideline discusses the reliability of various types of sources. The policy on sourcing is Wikipedia:Verifiability, which requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations. The verifiability policy is strictly applied to all material in the mainspace—articles, lists, and sections of articles—without exception, and in particular to biographies of living persons, which states:

Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—must be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.

Untamed1910 (talk) 05:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I really do not know what to do for you Calmsurble (talk) 05:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Marcus Owen Bell (Calmsurble)) for a period of 24 hours for persistent removal of a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mifter (talk) 06:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a part of a FBI investigation this information was being deleted by the user Untamed1910 the page has verified information from the House of Delegates. https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?091+ful+HJ750ER Please unblock me this was someone vandalizing this page. It's like you are trying to remove a official court government document. Calmsurble (talk) 06:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Calmsurble (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a part of a FBI investigation this information was being deleted by the user Untamed1910 the page has verified information from the House of Delegates. https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?091+ful+HJ750ER Please unblock me this was someone vandalizing this page. It's like you are trying to remove a official court government document. ~~I will now report the users to the FBI so they can put criminal charges on you. This unfortunatley includes the person that put a block on this user~~ Struck per the below indication that the editor has rescinded their legal threat. Mifter (talk) 06:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

OK, you rescinded the threat. But you still don't make a case for lifting the partial block. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mifter (talk) 06:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will recind the legal threat. Calmsurble (talk) 06:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have removed the full block and restored the previous partial block on Marcus Owen Bell (Calmsurble). Best, Mifter (talk) 06:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I put a revert is because the person was trying to delete the page without giving a proper reason of why a government house of delegates document was unreliable source. Also the person did not try to discuss anything. The user Untamed1910 vandalized the article Calmsurble (talk) 07:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sam Walton (talk) 09:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Calmsurble (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not created any alt account on this website for any illegitimate uses. This is a false claim and I suspect the reasoning to block my user name is to erase identity. Calmsurble (talk) 15:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, the reasoning for your block is to stop you from abusing multiple accounts. By creating User:Statecenter to argue at Talk:Marcus Owen Bell (Calmsurble), you've dramatically decreased any chance of being unblocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's clear from all of the sockpuppet edits to Marcus Bell (see here) that you have created a lot of different accounts, making the same edits to this page to promote yourself and getting blocked every time. Unless you have some possible explanation for this, you will not be getting unblocked. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:14, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Calmsurble. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Amanda (she/her) 03:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]