User talk:Call me LORDiNFAMOUS
- You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the textThe duration of the block is 24 hours. Here are the reverts in question. William M. Connolley (talk) 11:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
Call me LORDiNFAMOUS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a "sock" just trying to edit and contribute to wikipedia
Decline reason:
You are indeed a sock, and your accounts will remain blocked. If you post multiple unblock requests I will prevent you from editing this page. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 16:15, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Do not remove previously declined requests. Hersfold (t/a/c) 15:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hello. As H says, don't remove previous requests. It doesn't fool anyone but it does irritate. Now, are you sure you know what WP:SOCK is and are you sure you aren't one? ps: rm this again and I protect this page William M. Connolley (talk) 15:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- You are not acceptable since you were already involved. Call me LORDiNFAMOUS (talk) 16:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
This page is now protected because you removed declined requests despite being told not to. Sandstein 16:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)